I agree with you 100%. There is, however, a difference between a broad policy of advancing individual freedom, including on the issues you list above, and being opposed to "the homosexual lifestyle" as many conservatives are.
You are wrong. Most conservatives are against the homosexual agenda. If sexual perverts want to do their thing in private, in their own houses, not in public beaches, parks, hiking trails and public bathrooms (yes, I’ve been driven out of all kinds of places because of their sick behavior), and not try to change the very face of America via legislation to suit their perversion, I could give a rip what they do - IN PRIVATE!
But that is not what they want. The homoseuxal agenda pushers do not want tolerance, THEY WANT DOMINANCE! And they have ZERO TOLERANCE FOR DISSENT!
AND I AM SICK OF IT!
“I agree with you 100%. There is, however, a difference between a broad policy of advancing individual freedom, including on the issues you list above, and being opposed to “the homosexual lifestyle” as many conservatives are.”
I’m opposed to the homosexual lifestyle. I’m also opposed to adultery and fornication. Does that mean I want to round up and imprison homosexuals, adulterers, and fornicators? No. It does not.
It’s quite possible to “oppose” a behavior without wanting to outlaw it or punish those who practice it. There is nothing immoral or wrong about opposing the homosexual lifestyle. In fact, that’s the moral position.
When "the homosexual lifestyle" includes the demand for freedom to do things such as THIS , it has nothing to do with being conservative.