Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AreaMan

I hope he enjoys his jail term!


2 posted on 02/19/2010 10:10:08 AM PST by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: iowamark
I hope he enjoys his jail term!

Housing problem solved...ta da!

6 posted on 02/19/2010 10:12:31 AM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark
I hope he enjoys his jail term!

For what crime?

8 posted on 02/19/2010 10:13:25 AM PST by xjcsa (Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

There is no jail term since the bank didn’t own the home yet....proceedings hadn’t gone through .....He will have civil proceedings filed against him that I expect he will cure with Bankruptcy....

Based on his IRS position and other financial problems I doubt that any profit over the $170K amount would have been relinquished to him.

Interesting......At least it wasn’t arson which would have placed firefighters at risk and may have been illegal....


16 posted on 02/19/2010 10:19:32 AM PST by nevergore ("It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

A very stupid move. A much smarter move would have been to sell it before foreclosure and pay the bank off and keep the rest. Now it is worth only what the land it was sitting on and he is STILL liable for the loans.


23 posted on 02/19/2010 10:24:29 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Truth - Reality through the eyes of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

36 posted on 02/19/2010 10:36:12 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

“Hoskins said he’d gotten a $170,000 offer from someone to pay off the house, but the bank refused, saying they could get more from selling it in foreclosure.”

Since we are sending people to jail here for comitting acts that we don’t like, which are not necessarily crimes, I vote for the bank manager to be his celly.


44 posted on 02/19/2010 10:40:04 AM PST by Grunthor (America needs Obamacare like Nancy Pelosi needs a Halloween mask.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

One can take so much. He has given up.


49 posted on 02/19/2010 10:45:28 AM PST by TribalPrincess2U (demonicRATS ... taxes, pain and slow death. Is this what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

He probably won’t get jail time for this, but he certainly opened himself up to an enormous civil lawsuit from the lienholder(s) for destroying the asset that secured a financial instrument (or words to that effect).

He could very well be found liable for the amount of the loan anyway, since he chose to destroy the house. At the very least, he has sown the seeds for his own financial destruction, and the fallout from this life decision could well follow him around to his grave. A jury verdict against him would be far more damaging than a foreclosure would have been.


74 posted on 02/19/2010 11:29:04 AM PST by Bean Counter (I keeps mah feathers numbered, for just such an emergency...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson