Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoFloFreeper

My list of GOP Senate pickups now moves to +7...

Definitely - Indiana +1 (was in the “maybe” group), Nevada +2, North Dakota +3, Arkansas +4

Probably - Pennsylvania +5, Delaware +6, Colorado +7

Maybe - Illinois, Wisconsin

Lucky - NY Gillibrand, Cali, Washington

No Way - NY Schumer, Connecticut, etc


Probably won’t lose - Missouri, Ohio, New Hampshire

Definitely won’t lose - Florida, Louisiana,etc


71 posted on 02/15/2010 7:55:59 AM PST by lowtaxsmallgov (This Administration has absolutely no idea how to grow an economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lowtaxsmallgov
I think we may have a decent chance of a Pickup in Name Only here in Illinois. The dem candidate has some nasty mob ties that are coming out. And he is a banker, so all of Obama's rhetoric about bad bankers getting big bonuses doesn't help this guy a whole lot. And the dem governor candidate is very weak.

The bad news is that Kirk is a Turbo RNIO.
126 posted on 02/15/2010 8:10:01 AM PST by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: lowtaxsmallgov

“Maybe - Illinois, Wisconsin

Lucky - NY Gillibrand, Cali, Washington

No Way - NY Schumer, Connecticut, etc”

I think Illinios, Wisconsin, and NY-Gillibrand are going to flip.

Please do not brick or zot me for saying this, but I want the Dems to hold the majority in both the House and Senate but with neutered margins. If your progonstications come true and only two of my three, then we get +9 in the Senate. That leaves it at 50-50 with the Ds still in charge, but they may as well forget about passing anything significant. Heck, a simple gain of +4 in the Senate is about all we need.

In the house, I’d like to see something like a +35 swing for Republicans. Yes, the idiots remain in charge, but, again, this effectively neutralizes Pelosi (I’d like to see her step down WITH the Dems in charge personally ... what a blow to her ego that would be).

In this case, Obama still cannot blame anyone but Bush for his failures. The Ds are “still in charge” in congress. This keeps all fingers pointed at Obama as he has basically made himself in “completely in charge” with these majorities in congress.

If the Republicans take back either the House or Senate, you may as well replace the word “Bush” with either “House” or “Senate”. I wouldn’t be unhappy if we won both, but any scenario where Obama does not have complete control gives Obama a boogeyman to blame in the 2012 elections (people will have forgotten 2009-2011 assuming nothing spectacular happens between now and then).


163 posted on 02/15/2010 8:21:10 AM PST by edh (I need a better tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: lowtaxsmallgov

Won’t lose FLorida? Rubio will bet Crist.


386 posted on 02/15/2010 10:41:20 AM PST by mojitojoe (“Medicine is the keystone of the arch of socialism.” - Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: lowtaxsmallgov

Won’t lose FLorida? Rubio will bet Crist and he will beat the Democrat. The Hispanics love Rubio.


388 posted on 02/15/2010 10:42:01 AM PST by mojitojoe (“Medicine is the keystone of the arch of socialism.” - Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson