Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Star Traveler
“Medina might have had a chance until Glenn Beck got a hold of her... :-)”

I listened to the interview. It seems to me that he lobbed her a softball. When she failed to hit it; he put it on a tee for her. She then failed to hit it off the tee — she didn't even get close. She did this to herself.

The truly unnerving thing is that it seems no one — no one in the media, and no one in the GOP — thought to ask such simple questions before Beck. Was she vetted at all, in any way?

19 posted on 02/14/2010 3:36:46 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

Yeah, we gotta be careful that way...


22 posted on 02/14/2010 3:40:49 PM PST by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

Medina was asked two direct questions to which she could not give a simple direct answer. Instead she decided to do the Texas Two Step and she really stepped in it.

The questions were phrased begining with:

1. Do you believe ........

2. would you disavow them or allow them to continue to advise you........


23 posted on 02/14/2010 3:41:36 PM PST by deport (TEXAS PRIMARY -- 2 DAYS TO EARLY VOTING......... 17 DAYS MARCH 2, PRIMARY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
The truly unnerving thing is that it seems no one — no one in the media, and no one in the GOP — thought to ask such simple questions before Beck. Was she vetted at all, in any way?

Sad, isn't it? I guess anyone can get on the republican ballot just because they want to.

I watched both debates and the questions were pathetic, never asked any serious questions of any of the candidate. Second debate was so bad, the panel doing the questioning was verbally fighting with Perry and Hutchison over percentages and statistics. Never saw such a poorly planned debate.

It was almost as if they didn't want you to know anything about any of them. Medina was never asked if she was pro life, but Hutchison was hammered on it. Medina was never asked about her close associations with Ron Paul, never asked if she was anti-war and obviously never asked her opinion of the 9-11 truthers.

31 posted on 02/14/2010 3:54:44 PM PST by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
The truly unnerving thing is that it seems no one — no one in the media, and no one in the GOP — thought to ask such simple questions before Beck. Was she vetted at all, in any way?

It's not up to the party to "approve" the people who choose to be candidates for the party's nomination. And they're not going to make a stink about somebody who's off the reservation -- if they don't appear to be serious contenders. Which describes Medina, until just recently.

This affair is, instead, a slap in the face to the Texas MSM. It's their job to ask revealing questions.

However, to date, the Texas MSM has been happy to not only softball, but promote, Medina -- because she represented a conceivable threat to the GOP establishment candidates that they deeply detest.

The Dallas Morning News, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, the Houston Chronicle, the Austin American-Statesman and the San Antonio Express-News just didn't do their job. As we're accustomed to, in any case.

46 posted on 02/14/2010 4:38:39 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson