Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

History of England starts at 1700, says university
The Telegraph ^ | 2/11/2010 | Graeme Paton

Posted on 02/11/2010 3:19:42 PM PST by bruinbirdman

Academics have attacked a decision by a top university to scrap research into English history before 1700.

It was claimed that the move by Sussex University risked jeopardising the nation’s understanding of the subject and “entrenching the ignorance of the present”.

Under plans, research and in-depth teaching into periods such as the Tudors, the Middle-Ages, Norman Britain, the Viking invasion and the Anglo-Saxons will be scrapped, along with the Civil Wars.

The university will also end research into the history of continental Europe pre-1900, affecting the study of the Napoleonic wars and the Roman Empire.

The university said it was “reshaping” its curriculum and research following a £3m cut in Government funding.

Last week, universities across the country were told their budgets were to be slashed by £449 million next year, including a £215m reduction in teaching funding, with threats of further cuts in the future.

Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, has claimed that institutions can use the opportunity to focus resources on their strongest areas.

But in a letter to The Daily Telegraph, 17 leading historians said the move was short-sighted and risked undermining the public’s understanding of the past.

“To cut everything but the most modern puts in peril the public function of history, entrenching the arrogance of the present and making a mockery of the claim by the

minister behind these cuts that 'we also wish to keep this country civilised',” said the letter.

The academics, who all trained at Sussex, said that the decision to sever ties with European history before 1900 was a particularly retrograde step.

“For a university which has long prided itself on its European links to abandon the serious study of such pivotal areas of modern history as the French Revolution will mean depriving Sussex graduates of the mental furniture of educated

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: godsgravesglyphs; worldhistory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: bruinbirdman

The various waves of Danish/Viking invasions after the Roman influence subsided were important to the development of unique English, and eventually, American traditions and precepts of law, while the rest of Europe developed primarily on Roman Maxims of law.

The Vikings/Danish were a tribal people and had a class of equal freemen. Much of their law was stated in terms of injury or trespass to body, mind and property. Punishment was generally in the form of fines. This formed the basis for tort law. These people met in local, area and regional assemblies where disputes were heard. The law was an oral tradition and “best men” of each area were selected to recite what the law was.

The law was considered “once given” (by god) and unchangeable. This evolved into the jury system and stare decisis. Precepts of common law can be traced today back to their roots in these early recitations of what the law is.

The “Rights of Englishmen” were established prior to 1700 - the Magna Carta, Provisions of Oxford, Provisions of Westminster, Mise of Lewes, Confirmation of Charters of 1297, Triennial Act, Grand Remonstrance, Nineteen Propositions, Militia Bill, declaration of Commonwealth, Bonham’s Case in 1610, Parliament’s “Apology” of 1604, the “Great Protestation” of 1621, “The Instrument of Government” and bill of rights - An attempt at a written constitution, the Levellers and the 1649 “Agreement of the People,” Declaration of Breda, Thomas v. Sorrel, Declaration of Rights” of 1689, and Act of Habeas Corpus.

The “Petition of Right” was the first major constitutional document since the Magna Carta, declaring the fundamental right of Englishmen as positive law. In four sections, the petition addressed limits on royal powers as established in long-standing custom: (1) No person should be required to pay a tax or benevolence without parliamentary approval; (2) No person should be imprisoned without cause being shown, with the royal command not to be sufficient cause; (3) No troops should be quartered in private homes without the consent of and compensation to their owners; and
(4) The crown should issue no commissions for proceedings by martial law.

The “Declaration of Rights” of 1689 claimed restoration of practices based on the constitution of 1641. The Declaration denied the “pretended” right of the king to suspend laws. It implemented a new coronation oath binding the sovereign to govern according to acts of Parliament. The Declaration also stated:

(1) All (kings) prerogative courts were declared illegal; (2) Levying taxes or enforced payments to the crown without parliamentary consent was declared illegal; (3) Everyone was recognized as having the right to petition the Crown; (4) The King was prohibited from maintaining a standing army without Parliamentary consent; (5) It was declared lawful to keep and bear arms; (6) The election of members of the Parliament was to be free of coercion by the government; (7) Freedom of debate in Parliament was guaranteed; (8) Excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishment was prohibited; (9) Juries were to be empaneled and returned in every trial; (10) It was established that the Parliament must be frequently convened; (11) The judiciary became independent, not serving at the pleasure of the Crown but permanently on “good behavior”; (12) no one owed allegiance to a sovereign who was Catholic or married to one; and (13) it set forth the succession to the throne.

Most of the development of later law was land law. If they throw out all history prior to 1700, they throw out most of what established and secured England as a unique and free born people.


61 posted on 02/12/2010 10:58:57 PM PST by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marsh2
Of course, you wouldn't have known that half my relatives still live in Denmark, would you?

yitbos

62 posted on 02/13/2010 12:03:34 AM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

“Academics have attacked a decision by a top university to scrap research into English history before 1700.”

I guess people like the Celts, Anglo-Saxons, Crusaders, Normans, Vikings and Plantagenets are too embarrassing ancestors for some of their unisex, global warming fruitcake descendents to discuss.


63 posted on 02/13/2010 5:16:31 AM PST by ZULU (Hey Obama, how DO you pronounce "corpsman"?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

And if they ARE illiterate, they get someone to sing it.


64 posted on 02/13/2010 8:29:27 AM PST by bannie (Somebody has to go to seed...it might as well be me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Not going to be good for the tourist industry.

Well, at least they can put more funding to black history month:)


65 posted on 02/13/2010 5:57:15 PM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson