Have you looked at it?
For those not familiar, this is a road well traveled. An opposing party looking for a short cut to get rid of a sitting president they don't want is not a new concept.
Did you ever read the amount of information the lefties compiled in the so-called “PlameGate” fiasco?
In that case there was a special prosecutor (Patrick Fitgerald) and a cast of characters that included a CIA agent, her ambassador husband, President Bush, VP Cheney, Scooter Libby, Karl Rove, Bob Novak, and many others.
The lefties were certain that Bush, Cheney and/or Rove would be charged with treason for outing a CIA agent and frog-marched into the federal pen.
Only one problem. What they believed to be legal certainties and iron-clad evidence ran headlong into the buzzsaw of a courtroom, where the “proof” has to be proved. Where the other side gets to refute evidence.
I've followed the BC topic since the Dem primaries. (You don't think Bill Clinton would have used this to get his wife elected so he could have access to Whitehouse interns again?) I see alot of speculation about legal outcomes that would never make their way to adjudication.
If this subject ever went anywhere, it would only be resolved politically, not judicially, and since I don't believe that either party would impeach the first sitting black president over a birth certificate technicality, I think the people who persisted in pushing it would get blamed and it would be conservatives that would pay the political toll.