I'm not familiar with his views on abortion, but I imagine he has to have came done on the side saying it should be legal. Otherwise I'm sure the voters in Mass. would haven't voted for him and the media would have made that a major issue during the campaign.
But what has he actually done to support abortion. There is the political reality of saying you're for it, but as a Senator the best thing he can do is fight to approve judges that would overturn Roe v. Wade. Of course that would just return the decision to the states, but that's better than what we have today.
I'm sure you would have been a lot more digusted if his opponent had won the election.
“I’m not familiar with his views on abortion, but I imagine he has to have came done on the side saying it should be legal. Otherwise I’m sure the voters in Mass. would haven’t voted for him and the media would have made that a major issue during the campaign.”
He has been pro-choice but blocked votes for taxpayer funding.
Scott Brown was supported by Mass Citizens For Life.
He voted for RomneyCare, which included taxpayer subsidized abortions. A $60 co-pay to kill your child; the rest is picked up by Mr. and Mrs. Taxpayer. I'd call that supporting abortion.
He's pro-choice, and that's the wimpy way of saying one is pro-abortion.
As long as he kills the bogus health care bill, it's a win. But Presidential? Not on the Republican side.