Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Hammers Supreme Court in Speech
CBS News ^ | Jan 27, 2010 | Brian Montopoli

Posted on 01/27/2010 7:51:06 PM PST by BP2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last
To: JoeProBono

Justice Ginsburg looks shocked: “What did he just say?”


41 posted on 01/27/2010 8:09:33 PM PST by keepitreal ( Don't tread on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BP2
The SCOTUS is one of them.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I hope SCOTUS will hear one of these birth certificate appeals.

42 posted on 01/27/2010 8:09:37 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Remember ObiOne voters fall in 2 camps 1)the “elite” college crowd (free ride with tenure) & 2) inner city “community organized” and unions. The first understand he’s lying but “the means justifies the end.” The second don’t listen or don’t understand what he’s saying but vote for him because they’re racists and/or free lunchers.

ObiOne knows that and can say anything he likes. Only conservatives will point out the fallacies and the machine will smear critics for any reason whatsoever and the headlines will obscure any rational argument.


43 posted on 01/27/2010 8:10:13 PM PST by Bhoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6
Here is video of President Obama during his State of the Union Address essentially trying to intimidate the Supreme Court by berating their decision to give free speech rights to American Corporations in political campaigns.

After Obama slammed the Supreme Court for their decision, you could see Justice Samuel Alito shake his head and appear to say to himself "not true," as the Democrats stood and applauded all around the Supreme Court members.

I don't know if there is precedent for a President to do something like this or not in a State of the Union Address with the Court sitting in front of him, but it seems to me this was way out of bounds and totally disrespectful.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pB5uR3zgsA&feature=player_embedded

I think it's time to invoke the 25th Amendment...give him a knock out pill put him in a padded cell...this guy is NUTS.

44 posted on 01/27/2010 8:10:55 PM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BP2
And, in 98-99, we were sure that it couldn't possibly be worse than billary and hitlary...

Now, as I reread many of the threads from that golden era on FR that I archived, I almost get weepy-eyed thinking back to those halcyon days...

Where is Joe M. now that we really need him (drunk or sober)?

I'll bet even old K is dancing in hell laughing at us...Saying "I told you so!"

45 posted on 01/27/2010 8:11:54 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

That video is just unreal. I cannot believe what he did to the Court. “With all due respect” my rear.


46 posted on 01/27/2010 8:14:17 PM PST by keepitreal ( Don't tread on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: CaptainMorgantown; All

On FoxNews, even Juan Williams said immediately after the speech:

"I'm not sure that is was appropriate for the President of the United States to scold the Supreme Court, as the Supreme Court sat there ... allowed members of Congress to stand up and applaud in opposition to that recent decision. It worries in term of intimidation a branch of government."


47 posted on 01/27/2010 8:16:37 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg

Like that’s gonna happen?? LOL! He’ll kill the banks but not the unions!


48 posted on 01/27/2010 8:17:14 PM PST by luvie (DIMs?......start packin'--you're fired!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CaptainMorgantown; All

On FoxNews, even Juan Williams said immediately after the speech:

"I'm not sure that is was appropriate for the President of the United States to scold the Supreme Court, as the Supreme Court sat there ... allowed members of Congress to stand up and applaud in opposition to that recent decision. It worries in term of intimidation of a branch of government."


49 posted on 01/27/2010 8:17:31 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BP2
"I'm not sure that is was appropriate for the President of the United States to scold the Supreme Court, as the Supreme Court sat there ... allowed members of Congress to stand up and applaud in opposition to that recent decision. It worries in term of intimidation a branch of government."

Come on, Juan!!! He was just "Getting in their faces!"

50 posted on 01/27/2010 8:59:07 PM PST by gogeo ("Every one has a right to be an idiot. He abuses the privilege!" Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Your comment makes one of my all time top 10 FReeper phrases I’ve ever read. LOL! Still laughing over here!


51 posted on 01/27/2010 9:01:21 PM PST by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (****************************Stop Continental Drift**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader
" They will only be more than happy to railroad his a$$ every chance they get. They can also grease the skids for his impeachment. "

Perhaps one of those lawyers who are trying to get a case before a court to open his records for discovery would be the Supreme court, who would be more than inclined to grant " standing " to one of the plaintiffs.

no, no, wait, wait, if they do that, the Supreme Court would be on Janet Napolitano's Department of Home Land Security watch list.... Sarcasm...
52 posted on 01/27/2010 9:21:59 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BP2

The libs are still furious over this SCOTUS decision. I have been in huge arguments with them. The part they cannot answer is when I point out that the Kansas City Star, the LA Times, the Chicago Tribune are all owned by corporations and THEY have free speech and even endorse candidates just before the election. Furthermore, NBC and MSNBC are owned by General Electric.

That means that SOME corporations would have free speech while others would not.

The point being, is that just like the Tim Tebow “pro-life” commercial in the Super Bowl, if a conservative doesn’t like what someone says, we provide our own speech. When a lib doesn’t like what someone else says, they silence them.


53 posted on 01/27/2010 9:25:36 PM PST by CJacobs (From the Ozark / Clarksville area)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flag_This

Ping for a link to the pic..........


54 posted on 01/27/2010 9:28:36 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Touch Not the Cat
Yep, and I believe the donations were from twenty-five dollar disposable CC’s.
55 posted on 01/27/2010 9:29:22 PM PST by MaxMax (Lets get a sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BP2
It is my understanding she is suffering from pancreatic cancer. Just thought you would like to know
56 posted on 01/27/2010 9:30:56 PM PST by Chgogal (American Mugabe, get your arse out of my bank, my car, my doctor's office & my elec. utility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

Obama is such an embarrassment to us and the rest of the world. How shameful to make such a comment. This guys is sinking fast.


57 posted on 01/27/2010 9:32:06 PM PST by gswilder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

58 posted on 01/27/2010 9:33:29 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal; All

President Abraham Lincoln blasted the court's decision in the Dred Scott case in his first inaugural address in 1861:
"The candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the Government upon vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made in ordinary litigation between parties in personal actions, the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned their government to that eminent tribunal."


However, there's a world of difference between the Dred Scott case and the SCOTUS' most recent decision that puts businesses and unions on equal footing in contributing to the political process that affects them both (and us) when translated into public policy.


59 posted on 01/27/2010 9:34:49 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Ginsburg looked like a peruvian mummy they wheeled in from the Smithsonian.

Now that's funny. I don't care who you are.

I was also thinking she looked horrible (near death?)...

60 posted on 01/27/2010 9:36:59 PM PST by The Citizen Soldier (At the first of the year I feared for my grandkids... then it was my kids... now it's me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson