Skip to comments.
Obama aims to ax moon mission
Orlando Sentinel ^
| Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Posted on 01/27/2010 7:07:00 AM PST by rightcoast
NASA's plans to return astronauts to the moon are dead. So are the rockets being designed to take them there that is, if President Barack Obama gets his way.
When the White House releases his budget proposal Monday, there will be no money for the Constellation program that was supposed to return humans to the moon by 2020. The troubled and expensive Ares I rocket that was to replace the space shuttle to ferry humans to space will be gone, along with money for its bigger brother, the Ares V cargo rocket that was to launch the fuel and supplies needed to take humans back to the moon.
There will be no lunar landers, no moon bases, no Constellation program at all.
In their place, according to White House insiders, agency officials, industry executives and congressional sources familiar with Obama's long-awaited plans for the space agency, NASA will look at developing a new "heavy-lift" rocket that one day will take humans and robots to explore beyond low Earth orbit. But that day will be years possibly even a decade or more away.
In the meantime, the White House will direct NASA to concentrate on Earth-science projects principally, researching and monitoring climate change and on a new technology research and development program that will one day make human exploration of asteroids and the inner solar system possible.
There will also be funding for private companies to develop capsules and rockets that can be used as space taxis to take astronauts on fixed-price contracts to and from the International Space Station a major change in the way the agency has done business for the past 50 years...
See link for full article...
(Excerpt) Read more at orlandosentinel.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agenda; bho44; bhonasa; bhoscience; nasa; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-156 next last
To: rhombus
One thought is that a lunar railgun could take the place of an even more expensive and very vulnerable terrestrial nuclear arsenal. Lunar rocks cost nothing and there is nothing in the US arsenal that will stop an incoming cee-fractional lunar projectile.
61
posted on
01/27/2010 7:55:21 AM PST
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: rightcoast
Obama has taken the fatal shot at our economy and now he tries to kill of NASA....we need to get rid of HIM, not NASA.
62
posted on
01/27/2010 7:55:26 AM PST
by
tioga
To: Spktyr
Well if we’re not going to weaponize the moon, we should at least blow it up.
63
posted on
01/27/2010 7:55:52 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: pieceofthepuzzle
I think its likely that a fair number of academics are going to have buyers remorse. Yep. We're already seeing it, but it will undoubtedly grow to epic proportions. The academic elites will end up choking on that buyer's remorse, too. See? There is a ray of sunshine in the middle of all this misery....
64
posted on
01/27/2010 7:56:04 AM PST
by
Thermalseeker
(Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
To: rightcoast
‘In the meantime, the White House will direct NASA to concentrate on Earth-science projects principally, researching and monitoring climate change’
“GO TO HELL!!!” was my only reaction. Actually... it wasn’t that family friendly.
65
posted on
01/27/2010 7:58:05 AM PST
by
Bogey78O
(Don't call them jihadis. Call them irhabis. Tick them off, don't entertain their delusion.)
To: VRWCmember
BWahahahah...i clicked the thread just to say that, but you were sittin at #2 already...
66
posted on
01/27/2010 7:58:30 AM PST
by
Gilbo_3
(Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
To: Oldpuppymax
More importantly, most of the states where the NASA facilities are located are red states. A little “middle finger” from Obama to them.
67
posted on
01/27/2010 7:58:57 AM PST
by
thecabal
(Destroy Progressivism)
To: dead
I hope that’s a joke. We don’t have enough deployable nuclear weapons to blow up a medium sized asteroid, let alone the moon.
68
posted on
01/27/2010 7:59:33 AM PST
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: brownsfan
Privately owned and operated companies have big plans, maybe even grandiose plans, for the future of space. Certainly, they will be much better than NASA at the low earth orbit tasks.
69
posted on
01/27/2010 8:00:26 AM PST
by
saganite
(What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
To: Spktyr
...but a railgun or linear accelerator on the moon has a practically unlimited ammunition supply and can hit any spot on the planet Earth See "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress"
70
posted on
01/27/2010 8:01:14 AM PST
by
PogySailor
(We're so screwed.....welcome to the American Oligarchy)
To: denydenydeny
Leftists hate space exploration with a passion. To a lesser degree, there are some on the right who feel the same way, unfortunately.
To: ConservativeMind
Do you think supporters of George Washington or Abraham Lincoln were thinking, Dang, if only we had a NASA to get us to the Moon? No, but they had their own NASA's of their time, like the Lewis and Clark expedition and building a transcontinental railroad and telegraph network......
72
posted on
01/27/2010 8:03:12 AM PST
by
Thermalseeker
(Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
To: PogySailor
Mentioned upthread already.
73
posted on
01/27/2010 8:04:10 AM PST
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Spktyr
... but a railgun or linear accelerator on the moon has a practically unlimited ammunition supply and can hit any spot on the planet Earth. Robert A Heinlein "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" 1966 - has exiled convicts (think Australia) and forced evacuees revolting against an overbearing UN-Governed Earth by sending rocks against the Earth (What is now called KEW - Kinetic Energy Weapons).
74
posted on
01/27/2010 8:04:12 AM PST
by
SES1066
(Cycling to conserve, Conservative to save, Saving to Retire, will Retire to Cycle.)
To: rightcoast
People voted for this. More ACORN workers for NASA. LOL! What a joke. Stupid NASA workers voted for idiots like Bill Nelson and Obama. Shut it down and the space station. More moeny for illegal aliens - they need their endless benefits.
75
posted on
01/27/2010 8:05:49 AM PST
by
Frantzie
(TV - sending Americans towards Islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
To: My Favorite Headache
I was tempted to want to live in Florida, up until the recession. You all are suffering horribly down there, particularly the middle west portion I like to visit near Fort Myers.
And Obama just sits on his hands.
76
posted on
01/27/2010 8:06:55 AM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
To: Spktyr
It was a joke. I like the moon.
77
posted on
01/27/2010 8:07:09 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Thermalseeker
"So many technological advances we enjoy today grew out of the technologies developed for the Apollo and Gemini programs "
Which technologies?
78
posted on
01/27/2010 8:08:21 AM PST
by
Borges
To: rightcoast; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; ...
79
posted on
01/27/2010 8:08:38 AM PST
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Spktyr
One thought is that a lunar railgun could take the place of an even more expensive and very vulnerable terrestrial nuclear arsenal. Lunar rocks cost nothing and there is nothing in the US arsenal that will stop an incoming cee-fractional lunar projectile
And no radiation. You can't nuke an enemy stronghold and then occupy it the next day. Drop a rock on in and you can move in as soon as the rock cools down enough to stop being a liquid. And if they bury their command center under a mountain. Just use two or three consecutive shots to remove the mountain.
It completely changes the meaning of the phrase, "What are we supposed to do throw rocks at them?"
Now a lunar rock isn't a c-fractional relativistic projectile. But they are cheap, accurate, and can make a big hole in the ground. The cheap factor is important because an Earth launched interceptor costs so much that you can't possibly build enough that you can shoot down all the rocks.
80
posted on
01/27/2010 8:09:29 AM PST
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-156 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson