Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; Cannoneer No. 4; ...

-


2 posted on 01/27/2010 4:06:52 AM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All
From the article:
"In the language typical of an IPCC report, one might say that the radiative forcing created by Climategate and Glaciergate strongly suggest this is very likely to bring about cataclysmic melting of the organization within the next portion of the current decadal period. The words "very likely" in IPCC risk assessment terms mean a 90% or greater probability that something will happen. As it looks now, the IPCC is burnt toast and unless it is overhauled fast there's a 90% probability the climate-change political machine is going to come crashing down. "

4 posted on 01/27/2010 4:21:48 AM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
Within the past week, there was also this article:

Scientists using selective temperature data, skeptics say

The article describes the progressive reduction of the use of thermometers in high altitudes and in the north. The article includes this paragraph:

"NOAA . . . systematically eliminated 75% of the world's stations with a clear bias towards removing higher latitude, high altitude and rural locations, all of which had a tendency to be cooler," the authors say. "The thermometers in a sense, marched towards the tropics, the sea, and to airport tarmacs."

I posted the article (abridged as required by National Post) on Free Republic here:

Scientists using selective temperature data, skeptics say

5 posted on 01/27/2010 4:33:09 AM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson