“Again, the purists will eat all the other purists.”
Is it being a purist to stand up for the best possible representation of Conservative principles for the Republican candidate for this seat? And we’re talking about the primary no less. It’s not as if McAmnesty has gone through the primary and we’re here opposing him. If fighting for Conservative principles makes one puritanical (I guess that’s your implication??) - then so be it.
That’s what Free Republic stands for - or haven’t you read Jim Rob’s posts?
Bruce, I understand that, but your “purism” is different from someone else’s “purism”. I guarantee you that there are but a few posters here who would agree with every single one of your principles, and if you ever expressed one that someone disagreed with, they’d let you know. In fact, I’ll bet that’s probably happened.
It’s being borne out in the fact that Tea Partiers are actually going to protest the Tea Party Convention.
That’s what we conservatives seem to do here...eat our own.