Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/20/2010 10:26:55 AM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; goldstategop; CAluvdubya; CyberAnt; Syncro; Citizen James; BurbankKarl; ...
BANG!
2 posted on 01/20/2010 10:29:53 AM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Government schools are evil.


3 posted on 01/20/2010 10:32:51 AM PST by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

“He has received 24 referrals for his behavior.”

I don’t agree with the latest gun suspension but back in my day of HS, this guy would be never made it to #5 referral.


4 posted on 01/20/2010 10:34:09 AM PST by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"What if someone else took the guns out his truck and used them against someone?" he asked.

And what if someone stole your car and ran someone over with it? Or what if someone stole a pen from your desk and stabbed someone with it? My goodness.

5 posted on 01/20/2010 10:36:12 AM PST by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Marc Juhl-Darlington, Willows Unified School District's attorney, cited the education code in support of the expulsion, claiming schools have jurisdiction over student actions on or near school grounds, while on their way to or from school or during school activities.

FU barrister. You have no such lease on another's life.

6 posted on 01/20/2010 10:37:46 AM PST by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

the truck was not on school grounds when the dogs alerted to it. I wonder what would have happened had the truck belonged to a non student?


7 posted on 01/20/2010 10:38:43 AM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Green also argued that students did not get a "fair and proper notice of where the school is and where it isn't," so Tudesko could not have known what he was doing was wrong.

Except that what he did WASN'T wrong. They have no jurisdiction outside their property line. Do you know how many schools have disclaimed responsibility for students' behavior on the way to and from school, when it meant they would have had to do something? They can't have it both ways. They want the authority without any accountability. Um, no.

"What if someone else took the guns out his truck and used them against someone?" he asked.

What if someone broke into the house across the street and stole a steak knife he subsequently used to stab a student on school property? Do you expect us to believe you have jurisdiction over what steak knives the neighbors may own? Do you really want to own responsibility for that?

8 posted on 01/20/2010 10:38:52 AM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
He has received 24 referrals for his behavior.

Ah ... sounds like they already had it in for the student, and were looking for any excuse to eject him.

13 posted on 01/20/2010 11:34:32 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Virtue is to be apologized for. Depravity commands respect. - Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Many jurisdictions consider one’s vehicle an extension of one’s home. Same jurisdictions often/usually exempt contents of one’s home from the “within X feet of a school” prohibition.


14 posted on 01/20/2010 11:43:51 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Virtue is to be apologized for. Depravity commands respect. - Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Tudesko has a history of discipline issues at the school. Tudesko admits to using foul language, calling teachers names, fighting and being disruptive in class. He has received 24 referrals for his behavior

The parents are irresponsible for allowing their 17 year old son to have unsupervised possession of a gun at any time, when he has a behavioral history like this. If I'd been behaving like this at school, I'd have been totally grounded.

17 posted on 01/20/2010 12:14:45 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

I hope you’re a member of the NRA.


20 posted on 01/20/2010 4:14:32 PM PST by Shooter 2.5 (NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson