1 posted on
01/20/2010 10:26:55 AM PST by
neverdem
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; goldstategop; CAluvdubya; CyberAnt; Syncro; Citizen James; BurbankKarl; ...
BANG!
2 posted on
01/20/2010 10:29:53 AM PST by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: neverdem
Government schools are evil.
3 posted on
01/20/2010 10:32:51 AM PST by
stinkerpot65
(Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
To: neverdem
“He has received 24 referrals for his behavior.”
I don’t agree with the latest gun suspension but back in my day of HS, this guy would be never made it to #5 referral.
4 posted on
01/20/2010 10:34:09 AM PST by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: neverdem
"What if someone else took the guns out his truck and used them against someone?" he asked.And what if someone stole your car and ran someone over with it? Or what if someone stole a pen from your desk and stabbed someone with it? My goodness.
5 posted on
01/20/2010 10:36:12 AM PST by
agrace
To: neverdem
Marc Juhl-Darlington, Willows Unified School District's attorney, cited the education code in support of the expulsion, claiming schools have jurisdiction over student actions on or near school grounds, while on their way to or from school or during school activities. FU barrister. You have no such lease on another's life.
6 posted on
01/20/2010 10:37:46 AM PST by
doodad
To: neverdem
the truck was not on school grounds when the dogs alerted to it. I wonder what would have happened had the truck belonged to a non student?
7 posted on
01/20/2010 10:38:43 AM PST by
camle
(keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
To: neverdem
Green also argued that students did not get a "fair and proper notice of where the school is and where it isn't," so Tudesko could not have known what he was doing was wrong. Except that what he did WASN'T wrong. They have no jurisdiction outside their property line. Do you know how many schools have disclaimed responsibility for students' behavior on the way to and from school, when it meant they would have had to do something? They can't have it both ways. They want the authority without any accountability. Um, no.
"What if someone else took the guns out his truck and used them against someone?" he asked.
What if someone broke into the house across the street and stole a steak knife he subsequently used to stab a student on school property? Do you expect us to believe you have jurisdiction over what steak knives the neighbors may own? Do you really want to own responsibility for that?
8 posted on
01/20/2010 10:38:52 AM PST by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: neverdem
He has received 24 referrals for his behavior. Ah ... sounds like they already had it in for the student, and were looking for any excuse to eject him.
13 posted on
01/20/2010 11:34:32 AM PST by
ctdonath2
(Virtue is to be apologized for. Depravity commands respect. - Galt)
To: neverdem
Many jurisdictions consider one’s vehicle an extension of one’s home. Same jurisdictions often/usually exempt contents of one’s home from the “within X feet of a school” prohibition.
14 posted on
01/20/2010 11:43:51 AM PST by
ctdonath2
(Virtue is to be apologized for. Depravity commands respect. - Galt)
To: neverdem
Tudesko has a history of discipline issues at the school. Tudesko admits to using foul language, calling teachers names, fighting and being disruptive in class. He has received 24 referrals for his behaviorThe parents are irresponsible for allowing their 17 year old son to have unsupervised possession of a gun at any time, when he has a behavioral history like this. If I'd been behaving like this at school, I'd have been totally grounded.
To: july4thfreedomfoundation
I hope you’re a member of the NRA.
20 posted on
01/20/2010 4:14:32 PM PST by
Shooter 2.5
(NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson