And when Eternalviggy and DSC can convince 51% of the people in Massachussetts to get right on abortion with y'all, then they will be ready for a true pro-life conservative candidate.
Explain to me this map.
Those Blue areas that went for pro-death Coakley. How exactly do you win those with a Pat Robertson fire-breathing social conservative?
How exactly do you win for conservatism by electing liberals?
It's like asking Bill Clinton to protect your daughter's chastity. You can do it, but based on track records it ain't too smart in the long haul.
Your graphic didn’t display on my screen.
“And when Eternalviggy and DSC can convince 51% of the people in Massachussetts to get right on abortion with y’all, then they will be ready for a true pro-life conservative candidate.”
So, conservatives are to be expected to compromise their beliefs on baby-killing, but libtards may not be asked to compromise theirs. That about it?
That said, although there are no reliable polls or studies these days, it is clear that a large majority of Americans favor at least some restrictions on abortion. At least some of those would rather see a complete prohibition than complete deregulation.
“Those Blue areas that went for pro-death Coakley. How exactly do you win those with a Pat Robertson fire-breathing social conservative?”
A “Pat Robertson fire-breathing social conservative” is not the only alternative. A pro-life conservative could be more acceptable to more people (without stooping to deception).
Ronaldus Magnus carried Massachusetts in both 1980 and 1984, though demonrat election fraud nearly stole it away in 1980.
A conservative with the country’s best interests at heart can never say it’s impossible to elect real conservatives.