Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The World's Most Earthquake-Vulnerable Cities
Forbes ^ | 1/13/2010

Posted on 01/16/2010 8:06:31 PM PST by bruinbirdman

Third World countries like Haiti stand to suffer the most economically.

The strongest earthquake to hit Haiti in more than 200 years crushed thousands of structures, from humble shacks to the National Palace and the headquarters of U.N. peacekeepers.

Destroyed communications made it impossible to tell the extent of destruction from Tuesday afternoon's 7.0-magnitude tremor or to estimate the number of dead lying among the collapsed buildings in Haiti's capital of about 2 million people.

International Red Cross spokesman Paul Conneally told the Associated Press that an estimated 3 million people may have been affected by the quake and that it would take a day or two for a clear picture of the damage to emerge. Clouds of dust thrown up by falling buildings choked Port-au-Prince for hours.

~snip~

Kathmandu, Nepal, ranked first in the 2001 study, followed by Istanbul, Turkey; Delhi, India; Quito, Ecuador; Manila, Philippines; and Islambad/Rawalpindi, Pakistan--all of which could expect fatalities in the tens of thousands if disaster struck. The only first-world cities on the list were in Japan: Tokyo, Nagoya and Kobe. Fatalities in these cities were estimated in the hundreds, not thousands. Port-au-Prince was not on the list.

Events since then show the estimates to be fairly accurate, if not low. A 2008 earthquake in China's Sichuan province killed perhaps 15,000 people and left thousands buried under heaps of rubble. The magnitude 7.6 quake that struck the Kashmir region of Pakistan in October 2005 killed more than 73,000 people, many in remote parts of the country, not dense urban centers like Islamabad. Geohazard's study predicted a 6.0 hit on Pakistan's capital would kill 12,500 people.

In a 2004 paper Brian E. Tucker of GeoHazards warned the problem would become worse, citing a study of estimated earthquake fatalities based on population growth and construction changes

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: earthquake; nature; platetectonics; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: HereInTheHeartland

Its still dangerous due to are areas of landfill. They also really did not enforce building codes till rather recently.


21 posted on 01/16/2010 8:34:32 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

If they mothball those boats, they can will not be able to save the city. It will burn down a second time.


22 posted on 01/16/2010 8:37:16 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Current pumping of water from underground is one of the reasons Mexico City is sinking at a rate of a few centimeters every year.


23 posted on 01/16/2010 8:40:13 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Cant believe these idiots left Memphis off that list. If they get another earthquake set like 1812 it would gut the midwest and destroy Memphis entirely.


24 posted on 01/16/2010 8:40:56 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Something is seriously wrong when the .gov plans to treat citizens worse than they treat terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
“They also really did not enforce building codes till rather recently.”

I can't imagine if I was building something there that I wouldn't follow proper seismic engineering guidelines; code or no code.

I stayed in the Marine district last summer for a week; and I tried to see where the damage happened in that area in 89.
That was one of the hardest hit areas, as that is where the 1906 debris was dumped I think.

25 posted on 01/16/2010 8:41:11 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland (The End of an Error - 01/20/2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Yep - but, hey, it’s the liberals who have run this state into the ground. So, I guess SF will get what it asked for.


26 posted on 01/16/2010 8:41:50 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a U.S. Army Infantry Soldier whose wife is expecting twins SONS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

should have said “Marina District”


27 posted on 01/16/2010 8:42:21 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland (The End of an Error - 01/20/2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

Check out Megadisasters: San Fracisco Earthquake


28 posted on 01/16/2010 8:42:42 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
I still think LA is better prepared than SF.SF is a gigantic deathtrap.

Quite possibly. My sister was in San Jose during Loma Prieta.

29 posted on 01/16/2010 8:56:54 PM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

The money that was supposed to be spent on rebar instead lined some kleptocrat’s pockets.


30 posted on 01/16/2010 9:03:24 PM PST by poindexter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
Cant believe these idiots left Memphis off that list. If they get another earthquake set like 1812 it would gut the midwest and destroy Memphis entirely.

As a resident of Columbus, I agree. The New Madrid fault is the one that scares me.

31 posted on 01/16/2010 9:06:31 PM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

None of these cities in the zone has not bothered to lift a finger to upgrade their buildings and espcially bridges over the Mississippi River.


32 posted on 01/16/2010 9:09:01 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

Yep.! The New Madrid Quakes in 1811 and 1812 were super bad.
I think the last one in 1812 was a mind blowing 8.3 !!
think about that for awhile.


33 posted on 01/16/2010 9:20:02 PM PST by Pompah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

iV’e always worried that L.A. was gonna get hit bad. Theres only been one “direct” hit earthquake ever...Tang Shan, Northern China was directly over the epicenter. 650,000 supposedly died, all though the communists always claimed 250,000 died. The “New Madrid” fault in the midwest is scary too.


34 posted on 01/16/2010 9:25:09 PM PST by basalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Pompah

supposedly, it rang church bells in Boston....


35 posted on 01/16/2010 9:26:25 PM PST by basalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

They are constantly telling us in the Puget Sound Region of Washington state to be prepared for the “big one”.


36 posted on 01/16/2010 9:31:45 PM PST by Vicki (Washington State where anyone can vote .... illegals, non-residents, dead people, dogs, felons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

I am from Memphis, and remember the big scare back in the 80s?.
The big seismologist predictor, forgot his name, predicted a massive quake on the New Madrid fault.
I remember my mother tying a rope around the water heater in the attic, and securing other fragile things.
Of course, I know the history and creation of Realfoot lake,
when the Mississippi flowed north, as a result of the New Madrid quake.

It recently saw something in a news story that suggested
that the New Madrid fault is , for better terms, dissolving, melting away, or healing itself, and may soon not even be listed as a real fault.


37 posted on 01/16/2010 9:37:34 PM PST by AlexW (Now in the Philippines . Happy not to be back in the USA for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Vicki
Of course. You have a sleeping giant off the coast of Washington. The Cascadia Fault has not moved in quite a while.
38 posted on 01/16/2010 10:15:22 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

They also call it the Reelfoot fault.


39 posted on 01/16/2010 10:16:43 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AlexW; Centurion2000

40 posted on 01/16/2010 10:34:10 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson