Posted on 01/08/2010 5:22:33 PM PST by GOPsterinMA
Scott Brown on Hannity tonight (01/08/2009)
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Oops! How did that happen?
When is Roe v Wade up in congress for a vote.
WE Are At WAR, this is NO. 1
Scott Brown as a Lt.Col. understands who the enemy is and that we must defeat the IslamOfascists.
Scott is also against illegals and against amnesty
Scott is also against Obamacare.
Get Real
He did an excellent job. He has a good sense of his state and he knows how to make his points and not fall into any stupid traps.
Brown sounds like another Giuliani-Romney-Schwarzengger Republican. IOW, a liberal Republican candidate.
No thanks.
So you are against the war, you are for Obamacare, you are for illegals. You are way to liberal to be a Scott Brown voter
State Senator & Lt. Col. Scott Brown
Why Im Running...
America is a great country but we also have some challenges that we need to solve if were going to remain the worlds superpower. The most important of our challenges is getting the U.S. economy moving again.
People are hurting as they struggle to make ends meet. Theyre worried about their future, and that of their children and grandchildren. I want to ensure that we leave them an America that is financially stronger and independent: minus a national debt that we can never repay.
Economy
I am a free enterprise advocate who believes that lower taxes can encourage economic growth.
Raising taxes stifles growth, weakens the economy and puts more people out of work. Our economy works best when individuals have more of their income to spend, and businesses have money to invest and add jobs. I have been a fiscal watchdog in the state legislature fighting bigger government, higher taxes and wasteful spending.
Energy and Environment
I support common-sense environment policy that will help to reduce pollution and preserve our precious open spaces. I realize that without action now, future generations will be left to clean up the mess we leave.
In order to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, I support reasonable and appropriate development of alternative energy sources such as wind, solar, nuclear, geothermal and improved hydroelectric facilities. I oppose a national cap and trade program because of the higher costs that families and businesses would incur.
Education
I am passionate about improving the quality of our public schools. Accountability and high standards are paramount. I support choice through charter schools, as well as the MCAS exam as a graduation requirement.
I have worked to ensure that all children have access to a quality education. I am a strong advocate for the METCO program, which provides lower income students with broader educational opportunities.
Immigration
I recognize that our strength as a nation is built on the immigrant experience in America. I welcome legal immigration to this country. However, we are also a nation of laws and government should not adopt policies that encourage illegal immigration.
Providing drivers licenses and in-state tuition to illegal immigrant families will act as a magnet in drawing more people here in violation of the law and it will impose new costs on taxpayers. I oppose amnesty, and I believe we ought to strengthen our border enforcement and institute an employment verification system with penalties for companies that hire illegal immigrants.
Veterans
As a Lieutenant Colonel in the Army National Guard, I am uniquely aware of the importance and sacrifice of our men and women serving in the military.
I have been a vigorous supporter of legislation providing benefits to returning service members, as well as, benefits for the families of those killed in action. I believe we need to recognize the sacrifice of all of our servicemembers by keeping better track of returning military personnel so they get the services they deserve. That includes providing them with first-class medical care and other benefits to which they are entitled. I am known as a leader on veterans issues through my work on the Veterans and Federal Affairs Committee, the Hidden Wounds of War Commission, and the Governors Task Force on Returning Veterans.
Health Care
I believe that all Americans deserve health care coverage, but that we shouldnt have to create a new government insurance program to provide it. I support strengthening the existing private market system. In Massachusetts, I support the 2006 healthcare law that expanded coverage, but I believe the Deval Patrick administration must do more to contain the costs of the Commonwealth Care subsidy program.
Gun issues
I support the Second Amendment and believe that citizens have the right to keep and bear arms as a basic constitutional liberty. I support safe and responsible gun ownership.
Death penalty
I believe there are some crimes that are so heinous that they deserve capital punishment. Our Government should have the ability to impose the death penalty in cases where it is justified.
Abortion
While this decision should ultimately be made by the woman in consultation with her doctor, I believe we need to reduce the number of abortions in America.
I believe government has the responsibility to regulate in this area and I support parental consent and notification requirements and I oppose partial birth abortion. I also believe there are people of good will on both sides of the issue and we ought to work together to support and promote adoption as an alternative to abortion.
Marriage
I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. States should be free to make their own laws in this area, so long as they reflect the peoples will as expressed through them directly, or as expressed through their elected representatives.
Israel
Israel has made enormous sacrifices in an attempt to secure peace including unilateral withdrawal from Gaza. I support a two-state solution that reaffirms Israels right to exist and provides the Palestinians with a place of their own where both sides can live in peace and security.
As our closest ally in the Middle East, Israel lives every day under the threat of terror yet shares with America a dedication to democratic ideals, a respect for faith, and a commitment to peace in the region. Until a lasting peace is achieved, I support the security barrier erected by Israel which has proven successful in protecting Israeli civilians from terrorist attacks.
Iran
I support the bi-partisan Iran sanctions bill and believe that until Ahmadinejad gives up his nuclear ambitions he should be isolated from the rest of the world. With its reckless pursuit of nuclear weapons, Iran represents the biggest threat to Israel.
Ahmadinejad is a Holocaust denier who has threatened to wipe Israel off the map. Meeting with him confers legitimacy when the only correct response is to treat him as an outcast. A personal meeting with Ahmadinejad, as suggested by my opponent, would embolden him and be used as a propaganda tool to strengthen his position
http://www.brownforussenate.com/issues
If a Republican candidate can’t defend the most vulnerable and innocent life in America today, the unborn, he/she doesn’t deserve the vote of a single conservative. Period.
From his website, its quite clear, Scott Brown supports abortion rights and abortion on demand.
Read where he stands.
I am against abortion, Pro life groups in Mass. are supporting Brown.
The choice is Conservative Republican Brown wo supports the war on Terror, against Obama Care against illegasl
or The Liberal Democrat with the Obama agenda.
Fight the SEIU & Demcare corruption: Support Scott Brown for Senate
By Michelle Malkin January 3, 2010 09:48 PM
Last month, I noted how Massachusetts Senate GOP candidate Scott Brown called out rival Democrat candidate Martha Coakleys SEIU thug pals.
The Purple Shirts continue to pull out all the stops to install Coakley in Teddy Kennedys seat. The special election will be held January 19.
SEIU endorsed her in October, poured $214,000 into a radio ad buy for her in December, and are pouring all available resources and clout into her bid. As she prattles on about economic justice, Coakley now boasts a total campaign treasury of more than $5 million:
Attorney General Martha Coakley raised more than $1 million over the past six weeks for her US Senate campaign, bringing her total haul for the race to $5.2 million, her campaign reported yesterday. The campaign of her rival, state Senator Scott Brown, said it raised $700,000 during the same period, much of it on the Internet, for a total of $1.2 million.
Coakley, who faced three opponents in the Democratic primary, started the special election campaign with less than $500,000 in her campaign account, compared with about $300,000 for Brown, a Republican of Wrentham.
Coakley raised the $1 million between Nov. 20 and Dec. 31. The campaign did not release donor lists, say how much money the campaign spent over that period, or reveal how much it has in the bank to begin the new year. Those details must be included in information that has to be submitted next week to the Federal Election Commission.
Wheres the GOP establishment? As Ed Morrissey reported
last week: AWOL.
Yes, once again, its up to grass-roots conservatives and independents to help a GOP candidate fight the Big Labor-backed corruptocrat. Demcare hangs in the balance. Yet, Brown received a measly $50,000 from the national GOP and NRSC compared to the nearly $1 million that radical leftist Dede Scozzafava raked in.
Sean Trende crunches the numbers and will be stunned if Brown wins. But Patrick Ruffini sees evidence Scott Brown is within single digits. And William Jacobson reports on the grass-roots conservative groundswell for underdog Brown:
Three things have happened in the last three weeks to make this election competitive:
1. Coakleys read my lips moment: During the campaign, Coakley promised as a matter of principle not to support the Senate health bill if it contained restrictions on abortion. This promise was a prime fundraising tool. Just days after the primary, Coakley went back on this promise, and now is in the Harry Reid/Ben Nelson camp, to the anger of the left-wing base.
2. Obamacare is sinking in popularity: Harry Reid and the Democrats in the Senate demonstrated, in the weeks leading up to Christmas eve, the absolute moral corruption in Washington, D.C., by legally bribing Senators to vote for the health care bill. By supporting these efforts, Coakley has shown herself to be just more of the same (and her own maneuvers around the campaign finance laws drive that point home). At a time when the country is facing monumental deficits and national debt, Coakley handed Brown the central issue in the campaign Democratic efforts to force through a health care bill which is unpopular and economically ruinous. Had Coakley stood by her principles she would not be in this position.
3. Brown has gone viral: Largely shunned by the Republican establishment, Brown has utilized an online strategy which has ignited a grassroots campaign to get Brown elected. Do a Google search of blogs, and you will see that Brown is the talk of the internet, and most posts about Coakley are negative. While the mainstream media still holds great sway, Brown is seen as rising and Coakley as more of the same. Brown is winning the online battle.
Moe Lane at RedState underscores that most of Coakleys cash was spent securing the Dem nomination:
You see, most of that money Coakley raised got spent fighting for the nomination. William Jacobsons all over this topic: while he and I both think that shes got more money in the bank right now than Brown, its not the 5-to-1 advantage shes hyping. At best, its 3-to-2. Shes also facing the problem that her public retreat on abortion language in the bill is going to depress enthusiasm in the progressive netroots; and that Republican activists at least have noted that flipping Massachusetts could could! possibly derail the health care rationing bill, and are contributing accordingly
Pro-lifers in Massachusetts are also rallying around Brown. LifeNews reports:
In a state known for its left-leaning and pro-abortion politics, Brown has an uphill battle but he enjoys the support of Massachusetts Citizens for Life. Jack Rowe, chairman of the MCFL PAC, emailed LifeNews.com today to say that he is seeing movement in Browns direction. People are terribly upset about health care and asking what to do. Here is the very exciting part.
We in Massachusetts can actually save the whole country from this awful health care. Our PAC has been supporting Scott Brown because he will be a pro-life vote in the Senate. Scott Brown will also vote against the health care bill. After the compromise bill comes out of conference, it must be approved again by each house. Brown will vote against the bill.
That means there will not be 60 votes in the Senate. That means the bill will be defeated. Thats a lofty goal but Rowe is encouraging pro-life advocates in Massachusetts to get involved in the special election. Can we do it? We certainly can! Turn-out will be very small, he said adding that the pr-life movement could change the dynamics of the race of it gets mobilized.
You can do your part right now. Browns campaign site is here. His donation page is here. Theres a grass-roots moneybomb fundraiser for Brown on January 11.
Fight the SEIU and Demcare corruption. Help do the job the national GOP fund-raising organizations wont do. With two weeks until the special election date in Massachusetts, there isnt a moment to waste.
Posted in: Health care, SEIU
I’ve read Scott Brown’s website and where he stands on the issues.
Like Giuliani and Romney, Brown supports abortion on demand. Brown supports baby killing. He’s another POS!
That's the only chance he has. Endorsing Sarah Palin, CCW and Rush wouldn't work in this election.
Pro-lifers in Massachusetts are also rallying around Brown. LifeNews reports:
In a state known for its left-leaning and pro-abortion politics, Brown has an uphill battle but he enjoys the support of Massachusetts Citizens for Life.
Jack Rowe, chairman of the MCFL PAC, emailed LifeNews.com today to say that he is seeing movement in Browns direction. People are terribly upset about health care and asking what to do. Here is the very exciting part.
We in Massachusetts can actually save the whole country from this awful health care. Our PAC has been supporting Scott Brown because he will be a pro-life vote in the Senate.
Scott Brown will also vote against the health care bill. After the compromise bill comes out of conference, it must be approved again by each house. Brown will vote against the bill.
That means there will not be 60 votes in the Senate. That means the bill will be defeated. Thats a lofty goal but Rowe is encouraging pro-life advocates in Massachusetts to get involved in the special election. Can we do it? We certainly can! Turn-out will be very small, he said adding that the pr-life movement could change the dynamics of the race of it gets mobilized
You are supporting the hard core abortion candidate, Coakley.
Just glad you don’t have a vote in Mass.
Your support for abortion candidates is over the top
Your efforts are valiant, your thinking is tactical and sensible and you can grasp a big picture. All meaningless with some people.
The question we are faced with now is not just how best to protect the lives of the unborn, but the lives of the old and infirm and those who this bunch considers “defective”. This “health care” bill imperils them all. We need everyone we can possibly enlist in this battle.
Spot On!
Well, it is you who are spot on, but thanks :)
Either stand with pro-life conservatives, or go away!
"What's the difference between Brown and Romney? Or either of them and Benedict Arnold Specter? RINOs, statist liars and backstabbing political whores all.
47 posted on Friday, January 08, 2010 1:42:40 PM by Jim Robinson
Ben Nelson, Bob Casey, Reid, are supposed to be pro-life but they all voted for abortion via Obama Care whereas supposedly pro-choice Brown would vote against it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.