Posted on 01/03/2010 12:50:12 PM PST by Skepolitic
Spy chiefs turn on President Obama after seven CIA agents are slaughtered in Afghanistan By David Gardner
excerpt: Barack Obama was accused of double standards yesterday in his treatment of the CIA.
The President paid tribute to secret agents after seven of them were killed by a suicide bomber in Afghanistan. In a statement, he said the CIA had been tested as never before and that agents had served on the front lines in directly confronting the dangers of the 21st century.
He lauded the victims as part of a long line of patriots who have made great sacrifices for their fellow citizens and for our way of life.
Yet the previous day he had blasted systemic failures in the CIA and other US intelligence agencies for failing to prevent the Christmas Day syringe bomb attack.
One day the President is pointing the finger and blaming the intelligence services, saying there is a systemic failure, said one agency official. Now we are heroes. The fact is that we are doing everything humanly possible to stay on top of the security situation. The deaths of our operatives shows just how involved we are on the ground.'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1239941/Spy-chiefs-turn-President-Obama-seven-CIA-agents-slaughtered-Afghanistan.html#ixzz0baIEqJdD
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Well this just goes to show you that racial profiling really works. Because this bomber was a mussie he shoulld have been searched.
Well, it doesn't work because it's not being done... LOL... (not by our government anyway).
They should follow the model of the Israelis... they look for "people" while we look for "things" -- at airports (of course, not counting the watch lists, which I'm not too sure how good they are anyway...).
It's the people we should be concerned about, but I don't put out any hope that we'll change in this country, so it will continue as always. We're not going to change over to the Israeli model of security, that's for sure...
Pot meet kettle. YOU are welcoming attacks on American’s, INNOCENT American’s just to put the blame on this administration. Any idiot can see the Kenyan Muslim Marxist and his cronies are inept idiots. We don’t need innocent America’s killed to prove that point. Sorry, but what you said was wacky.....Really wacky..... and I don’t see one person here agreeing with you. Crawl back under your bridge.
Pot meet kettle. YOU are welcoming attacks on Americans, INNOCENT Americans just to put the blame on this administration.
Nope, no more than the Bush Administration is helping the Islamic terrorist and welcoming their attacks by saying that it's not a matter of "if" but a matter of "when"...
You fail to distinguish the issues of "what is" (as we see evidenced from the Bush Administration statements) as compared to "what one wants"...
And so goes the big problem that several posters have on this issue...
It was more than evil, it portrays a very disturbed mind. ST is no better than any other terrorist that wishes to see innocents killed.
It was more than evil, it portrays a very disturbed mind. ST is no better than any other terrorist that wishes to see innocents killed.
Well, I already know you have trouble reading and comprehending, but you don't have to show it off to everyone else, too... LOL...
Americans will become slaves as long as they have their TV clicker, NFL games, college ball and other meaningless BS.
The NFL runs Obama love commercials and pawned Rush yet he still watches and gushes over NFL ball games like a fool - and I am a big Rush fan.
The TV gives the left and Islam it’s power also oil money. Sports programming keeps the networks solvent. Your cable bill each month is divided up for each network $1 for CNN, $1 for MSNBC and so forth.
People in this country and in the west are sheep.
It’ll probably start with a *You said...* and end with a *LOL!* and everything in between will make no sense.
__________________
Now that’s funny! Don’t be surprised to see a more than one LOL in each of ST’s posts.
People in this country and in the west are sheep.
Even the Bible says that we are all sheep -- some gone astray and others are in the right sheep-fold...
What is needed is not necessarily to make sheep into "lions" or something like that -- but the Biblical answer is to make the sheep follow the right master -- which is Jesus, the Messiah of Israel. Of course, that doesn't happen or come about, until one accepts the Salvation provided for by the Messiah of Israel.
And then, they will have a "worldview" that is correct, regardless of what is on TV or what entertainment is around that attracts everyone else.
Now thats funny! Dont be surprised to see a more than one LOL in each of STs posts.
A good amount of laughing will help you live longer... :-)
Not a single patriotic civil servant wants to save the country? Hard to fathom!
Yeah, for those who want to "Islamify" the West... yes, it's a smokescreen. I say that (for those who intend that) because the Muslim clerics and other spokesmen in the Islamic countries make that very clear. They intend to use immigration (both legal and illegal) to infiltrate the West.
That does not explain the behavior of non-Muslim leaders of the West. People like to say "never attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity" but there are limits.
I also think that Islam should be outlawed in this country because it's a form or government, and not a religion.
You could say the same thing about any religion that is strong. Bringing Muslims to the West divides the people to strengthen the gathering tyranny. Cultural marxists make an ally of Islam to drive out Christianity.
That does not explain the behavior of non-Muslim leaders of the West. People like to say "never attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity" but there are limits.
Well, when you see it also in the Bush Administration, with President Bush pushing wide-open borders along with a lot of others... it does go to show you it's not limited to just the liberal side of the fence.
How to explain it... I don't know exactly, except that there are a whole heck of a lot of politicians who are for wide-open borders it seems. That's not an explanation of it, but merely saying what appears to be true and that it's not limited to the other side of the political fence.
You could say the same thing about any religion that is strong.
There are other idealogies which are not religions, but they act as if they are. They just don't say it. I'm not talking about them. They are political movements and they are recognized as political movements, but they are "religious" in their practice of it. Again, that's not what I'm talking about -- not that you were necessarily saying this, but I had to get that out of the way.
Then, when I do look at what is recognized as "religions" around the world -- I simply don't find any that I'm aware of (or maybe they're not really significant in the grand scheme of things...) -- which makes the "religion" part of the government -- right here and right now -- from the followers themselves. This is key and critical to understanding this.
I say that, because in Christianity, there is a one-world government coming, but it is only to be set up by the hand of the Messiah of Israel and it's only He who will be doing the fighting and He is the one who will literally slaughter all the people in the world who have refused to come under His world-wide authority and Kingship over the entire world.
So, I'm distinguishing a future "Kingdom" not from the people or followers of a religion -- but from the founder of the religion, Himself, coming back and forcibly setting up the Kingdom over all the nations.
That is in Christianity -- but as I say, not as part of what the followers are supposed to do.
And with any other religion, I'm just not aware of another one, in which the followers are to violently overthrow other governments and take over the entire world -- and they are not good adherents to the religion unless they do that.
And lastly, another big factor in this -- is that with all the other religions (for the most part, I would say), they all recognize "earthly authority" and governments and they practice their religion alongside of the existing government that they are under. They are not about overthrowing it, unless, of course, you're talking about overthrowing it as a political movement and for throwing off oppression -- politically speaking. That does exist, politically -- but not as part of the religious dogmas of that particular religion.
With Islam, they don't recognize other earthly authorities -- but -- for just a limited amount of time, while their adherents are not in a good enough position to overthrow that authority. When they do get into a good and solid position to try and overthrow that government -- they will. They do not recognize any other "governing authority" over them, except where they are forced to recognize it.
There is no difference in the Muslim's mind of a "religion" and a "government". To them, there is no difference and they don't even have the "thought processes" (culturally speaking) to even "recognize" a government as something separate from their religion. It's simply "not valid" and it's a government that must be overthrown, if it is not Islam.
Good post Star Traveler. Very good. And true as I see it and understand it. CO
Republicans,demoncrats,Conservatives,liberals,commiepinkos,nazis,and any other moniker you wish to put on someone will not matter very much if you get what you want whether it be now or later.
You still have a screw loooooose.
Typical talk for those who don’t want to recognize that Islam is at war with us in the West (and especially here in the United States) and simply want to stick their head in the sand... :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.