For the last few decades, most history taught and written has been heavily changed and altered by lefists.
I really don’t know what sources to tell you. But if you delve deeply into the history of Islam and how it spread rapidly througout the Middle East, into Persia and Afghanistan, then through India and into Indonesia, Malayasia and so on, as well as North Africa - you will see how they did it.
The sword.
That’s it. And then forced the populations to give up their existing religions. They slaughtered millions in several hundreds of years, enslaved countless numbers, raped, pillaged, etc. It’s a bloodly history of evil. They didn’t try to hide what they were doing and I have no idea why the history you learned didn’t teach it.
For instance, the history of India and Islam is horribly vicious, but due to political correctness which is currently crippling India, kids in schools now learn nothing of it. Nothing. It’s a disgusting criminal shame, probably the same thing here.
It’s a dirty secret that the world needs to know.
Muslims have a history of destroying other houses of worship - remember the Taliban and the giant, ancient statues of Buddha they bombed? Or turning them into mosques.
They make the Nazis look like amatuers. Oddly enough, they really teamed up with Nazis - soulmates, in a sense.
Well, that’s really not what we call a “reference”, as in giving documented sources to support your interpretations. While your opinions may be validated by factual sources, I’m unable to accept your assertions without some backup materials.
Are you saying here that you can’t give me any reference materials because they are all written by “leftists”? While their interpretations of historical facts may be from the Left, do you state that some historical references are factually incorrect?
I really am looking for historical reference works that will give me more factual knowledge about the development and spread of Islam. While the spread of Islam under the first four caliphates in the Middle East was military in origin, there was almost no revolt against them because they were actually better administrators than the former rules.
And in some countries, such as Indonesia (which has 200 million Muslims,86% of the population), the religion was adopted without any military violence - no “sword” at all. The spread of Islam in many parts of the world - large parts of the African continent, for instance - was through non-violent conversion. So the historical record is more complex than simply stating “the sword’ for its spread.
So I am asking in all sincerity for you to provide me with such factually-based reference books, so that I can read them. You are very firm in your opinions, and want to get a handle on where yo are coming from.