Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pabianice

Well then, don’t fly. “That was easy”


2 posted on 12/29/2009 5:45:09 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Always Right

Don’t fly is my solution. Would be interesting to see how the airlines react if the flying public just stays home. Perhaps the airlines would suffer enough loss in business to
begin pressuring the government for some sensible solutions to the security problem?


43 posted on 12/29/2009 5:58:27 AM PST by bytesmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Always Right
Absolutely my first thought at reading then headline.

"Then don't fly on our airlines you maggot infested piece of Camel dung!"
"Get on your Magic Carpet and take a ride back to Islamistan, but be there in time for the nuke we are going to eventually drop on yer raggedy head!"

95 posted on 12/29/2009 6:57:25 AM PST by ImpBill ("America ... where are you now?" signed, a little "r" republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Always Right

Yep if you won’t got through it just don’t fly. There is no guarantee of being able to fly to anyone out there and if you don’t like the scanners drive.


136 posted on 12/29/2009 12:20:46 PM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Always Right

Trouble is that in America’s worship of PC and cultural diversity, the Muslims will be allowed to board without the scan, but the rest of us will be forced to do it. Result: Air travel becomes even more grueling and invasive for the good guys, and terrorism will increase. Air travel will dwindle.

I guarantee the Muzzies will be exempted; how else will Hussein’s buddies be able to accomplish their/his goals?

At what point will the airlines recognize they’ve reached the point of diminishing returns and take a stand against this ridiculous political correctness?


153 posted on 12/29/2009 2:54:14 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (Never argue with a man whose job depends on not being convinced. (Mencken))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Always Right

Such a simple way to solve the problem. And we could actually go to “random” searches which would still stop anyone with a genuine dread of such a search from flying, and the rest of us could keep our shoes on AND read during the final hour of approach with a comfy blanket on our laps. And maybe even knit, just like the good old days.

Sigh . . .


234 posted on 12/29/2009 7:38:34 PM PST by caper gal 1 (Gone to Galt's Gulch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Always Right

Such a simple way to solve the problem. And we could actually go to “random” searches which would still stop anyone with a genuine dread of such a search from flying, and the rest of us could keep our shoes on AND read during the final hour of approach with a comfy blanket on our laps. And maybe even knit, just like the good old days.

Sigh . . .


235 posted on 12/29/2009 7:39:53 PM PST by caper gal 1 (Gone to Galt's Gulch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Always Right

My thought exactly


240 posted on 12/29/2009 8:56:13 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Always Right

wow, this technology is even better for airport security than anyone imagined!!!


254 posted on 12/30/2009 12:56:55 AM PST by Enchante (I Survived another day in the Obamanation, and all I get is this lousy t-shirt!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson