Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aruanan

There’s nothing Rorschach about this movie. It is obviously leftist agitprop.

The idea that pointing out this movie’s agenda keeps people from confronting Obama is ridiculous.

When a $200M piece of leftist propaganda is released into the world to damage America’s reputation, it’s good to sound the alarm.

The kind of naive passivity you advocate does nothing but enable those who hate this country.


16 posted on 12/25/2009 1:19:37 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Yardstick

Say what they want...

There is not a nation , nor has there been one that offers more opportunity and a better life for all. Its all choice.

No one can offer that, No where, its only in America.

And most these asses want to have a revolution?

Then wake up to what? Its bad enough that Obama is in there destroying the good things.... the future, freedom, liberty and democracy.

Damnrat pischers! No idea.


18 posted on 12/25/2009 1:33:49 PM PST by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Yardstick
There’s nothing Rorschach about this movie. It is obviously leftist agitprop.

Nothing is so obvious as something one wishes to see.

The idea that pointing out this movie’s agenda keeps people from confronting Obama is ridiculous.

I didn't say this, but this is a good example of the lack of care in reading that manifests itself in calling Avatar "agitprop." Taking over countries in this world's history is far more a practice of Communists and Muslims than anything in the West.

When a $200M piece of leftist propaganda is released into the world to damage America’s reputation, it’s good to sound the alarm.

Again, another example of begging the question.

The kind of naive passivity you advocate does nothing but enable those who hate this country.

I advocated no passivity, naive or otherwise, but again, this is another example of reactive reading in which the "reader" sees certain words and phrases that elicit a response based on his own inner meanings and then characterizes the writer as having written from that position. It's a dangerous practice that keeps one from seeing what is actually out there.
20 posted on 12/25/2009 1:43:20 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson