Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BillyBoy

Lincoln rejected that states had a right to secede and when the Confederate States of America asked him to remove his troops from Confederate territory he refused thereby starting his war of conquest over a sovereign nation

He was not as much of a flaming liberal as U.S. Grant or Thaddeus Stevens but he was a liberal. He believed that an overintrusive central government had the right to contravene the will of the individual states. He was the president who began the march towards the overbearing central government.

Lincoln was a liberal. That’s just the way it is. Lincoln is why we have such an overintrusive government today. His presidency started the rationale for it.


279 posted on 12/22/2009 8:17:00 PM PST by AzaleaCity5691
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]


To: AzaleaCity5691

All true, there is a historian named DiLorenzo (spelling?) who has documented what you say, but DiLorenzo is not accepted by the establishment historians. Neither is Arthur Herman, who wrote the revised history of Joe McCarthy, based on Soviet archival materials.


280 posted on 12/22/2009 8:22:27 PM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]

To: AzaleaCity5691
Perhaps you can explain why the "states rights" south gave 90% of their votes to Franklin Roosevelt, whose socialist new deal package gave us 20X the amount of "big government" than Lincoln ever had.

Are you going to argue that FDR was the "conservative" candidate in 1940?

281 posted on 12/22/2009 8:57:48 PM PST by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson