Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Photo Gallery showing damage to aircraft, antennas and strobe lights beyond end of runway. The aircraft's main landing gear finally left the ground 115 metres beyond the end of the runway.
1 posted on 12/19/2009 2:00:50 PM PST by naturalman1975
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: naturalman1975

Ouch. That’s going to leave a mark. On their careers.


2 posted on 12/19/2009 2:05:04 PM PST by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975
Beware the deadly typo.

Shouldn't the computer have told the pilots that they weren't gaining velocity fast enough?

6 posted on 12/19/2009 2:13:41 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

I’m thinking that there is a design error in addition to pilot error. If that much of a difference can be caused by a single key stroke mistake, the there needs to be at least some form of accuracy check on the data input.


11 posted on 12/19/2009 2:28:36 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

I don’t understand the “limited power takeoff”. It is entering a possibility for error. I assume you enter weight of aircraft, length of runway, altitude, temperature and the computer takes care of the power settings. Much better to just cram as much power out of the engines as possible and gain a margin for error says I. Ok I know you gain some fuel savings and perhaps engine life savings but look how much this cost. They dumped full tanks of fuel, bent the airplane and lost prestige for the airline. What does that cost is relation to the fuel savings provided by the puter?


12 posted on 12/19/2009 2:28:49 PM PST by DariusBane (Even the Rocks shall cry out "Hobamma to the Highest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975
I can't believe they didn't do an accelleration check. Ye gods, we were doing those forty years ago with stopwatches. Mechanical stopwatches.
16 posted on 12/19/2009 3:00:41 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

IF IT AIN’T BOEING, I AIN’T GOING!!


25 posted on 12/19/2009 3:49:47 PM PST by taillightchaser (When a democrat says "The American people" you know the next words out of his mouth will be lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975

I wonder how you say, “first the V’s, then the rotate” in their lingo?


28 posted on 12/19/2009 5:33:51 PM PST by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: naturalman1975
I just read Capt. Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger's memoir, "Highest Duty." He recounts lessons his father instilled in him in his youth, including one my own father taught me: measure twice, cut once.

That same attitude would have prevented this mishap.

29 posted on 12/19/2009 5:38:44 PM PST by behzinlea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson