Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: New Yawk Minute
You are right, she can't do (much) about her looks, BUTT like you said in the previous paragraph, she looks like she wears walmarts clearance rack. You don't wear sweaters 2 sizes too small, because its the fashion of 16 year olds, ESPECIALLY when you've got figure issues, ESPECIALLY when you're the first lady.

For the first 6 months she wore nothing but sleeveless outfits, supposedly "showing off" her arms, I didn't see it myself. But hey, if you're going to accent your highlights, at least be aware of your ASSets, especially when they're HUGE, and wear clothes more slimming.

Barbara Bush was an elegant first lady. She didn't have the body of a 20 year old, because she WASN't a 20 year old. She wore clothes that made HER look good, and were befitting the wife of a dignitary.

Laura Bush was GORGEOUS, and yet her clothes were impecable. She ALWAYS looked good, befitting the office her husband held.

The media tries to spin Mo's "beauty", and yet they attacked Sarahs. They attacked Sarah because the RNC spent $150,000 on clothes. Well, Obamas don't have a problem with $100# Wagyu beef or $300 Krystal champagne, they could spend $150,000 on MOs ward robe for when she meets the Queen of England or a PrimeMinister or Presidents wife.

Laura Bush always had beautiful business skirt suits and dresses, instead of things that looked like were ripped of the White House windows.

MO was supposedly in the upper level business world before she became 1st Wookie. You're going to tell me she dressed like THAT for success?

Obamas MIGHT be still considered NEW to the position, but they had plenty of time beforehand to come up to speed on style, fashion and ettiquette. Even if they were absolute newbs, they should still have a staff that could dress MO.

They DESERVE no slack.

30 posted on 12/19/2009 6:30:41 AM PST by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: mountn man
They attacked Sarah because the RNC spent $150,000 on clothes
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Sarah Palin made clear that the RNC did NOT NOT NOT spend $150,000 on clothing.

Clothing in various styles and sizes were purchased ( FOR THE ENTIRE FAMILY) and tried on in the privacy of their hotel rooms. All except the clothing that was appropriate and the right size were RETURNED!

40 posted on 12/19/2009 7:24:41 AM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: mountn man

And what really cracks me up is they equal her to Jackie Kennedy. Heh..someone is frikken blind.

Jackie was beautiful and so were her clothes. She looked like a princess.


55 posted on 12/19/2009 8:26:49 PM PST by New Yawk Minute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson