Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michelle Obama Separated at Birth
You Tube ^ | 12/17809 | RobtKraft

Posted on 12/19/2009 5:16:07 AM PST by vrwc54

The likeness is amazing.

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: michelleobama; obamaparody
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: vrwc54

I still say her dresser hates her.


21 posted on 12/19/2009 5:57:54 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jennyjenny

I think her clothes are horrible. I noticed them way before he was elected.

I dont know who is making the statements on how fashionable she is..but most of what she wears look like they would end up on the clearance rack at walmarts. I wouldnt be caught dead in some of those getups.

As far as her face and body..one cant help ones looks and size. I have seen worse than her..she isnt so bad. However, I think he could have done way better, in the looks department (if one chooses a mate by looks).


22 posted on 12/19/2009 5:59:29 AM PST by New Yawk Minute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
Did you watch the video?

Yes I did, as a matter of fact.

After I watched it, I posted my reaction to it.

23 posted on 12/19/2009 6:03:53 AM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: vrwc54
Oooh, she's gonna hate that last one.....compared to Hillary....OUCH!
24 posted on 12/19/2009 6:05:27 AM PST by CAluvdubya (Palin 2012...YOU BETCHA!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vrwc54

Ragging on someone because of the way they look is what liberals do.

We are better than this.


25 posted on 12/19/2009 6:06:25 AM PST by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webstersII
How did you know? I'm a liberal!

Seriously, read the thread. It wasn't about how she looked. Half the pictures were of beautiful women. It was about her clothes. *sigh*

26 posted on 12/19/2009 6:10:21 AM PST by vrwc54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
"Personally I like to think of her as the First Wookie. "

Always reminds me of Sasquatch.

27 posted on 12/19/2009 6:10:29 AM PST by Slump Tester (What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vrwc54

Yep ... Mrs. Wee Wee exhibits that certain fashion sense that sets her apart in the crowd ... no doubt about it

28 posted on 12/19/2009 6:13:39 AM PST by Zakeet (When in doubt, empty the magazine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webstersII
She is the First Lady of the United States. With that title comes some common rules about proper attire. She is representing us, after all.

This video is NOT about the she looks, it is about the way she DRESSES. She is almost always inappropriately attired. She wore a festive, sleeveless floral to a state funeral, for cryin' out loud!

Get over the "making fun of her looks" and see what is really being talked about...her clothing. It's quite embarrassing, unlike Jackie O. And that, she can certainly change.

29 posted on 12/19/2009 6:15:14 AM PST by CAluvdubya (Palin 2012...YOU BETCHA!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: New Yawk Minute
You are right, she can't do (much) about her looks, BUTT like you said in the previous paragraph, she looks like she wears walmarts clearance rack. You don't wear sweaters 2 sizes too small, because its the fashion of 16 year olds, ESPECIALLY when you've got figure issues, ESPECIALLY when you're the first lady.

For the first 6 months she wore nothing but sleeveless outfits, supposedly "showing off" her arms, I didn't see it myself. But hey, if you're going to accent your highlights, at least be aware of your ASSets, especially when they're HUGE, and wear clothes more slimming.

Barbara Bush was an elegant first lady. She didn't have the body of a 20 year old, because she WASN't a 20 year old. She wore clothes that made HER look good, and were befitting the wife of a dignitary.

Laura Bush was GORGEOUS, and yet her clothes were impecable. She ALWAYS looked good, befitting the office her husband held.

The media tries to spin Mo's "beauty", and yet they attacked Sarahs. They attacked Sarah because the RNC spent $150,000 on clothes. Well, Obamas don't have a problem with $100# Wagyu beef or $300 Krystal champagne, they could spend $150,000 on MOs ward robe for when she meets the Queen of England or a PrimeMinister or Presidents wife.

Laura Bush always had beautiful business skirt suits and dresses, instead of things that looked like were ripped of the White House windows.

MO was supposedly in the upper level business world before she became 1st Wookie. You're going to tell me she dressed like THAT for success?

Obamas MIGHT be still considered NEW to the position, but they had plenty of time beforehand to come up to speed on style, fashion and ettiquette. Even if they were absolute newbs, they should still have a staff that could dress MO.

They DESERVE no slack.

30 posted on 12/19/2009 6:30:41 AM PST by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Then she should stop looking for the spotlight.


31 posted on 12/19/2009 6:31:56 AM PST by IbJensen (A Prayer for Obama (Ps 109.8): "Let his days be few; and let another take his position.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

That dress was the toughest one of all! There were simply NO dresses out there that looked like black widow spiders.


32 posted on 12/19/2009 6:42:45 AM PST by vrwc54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Popman

You are so right.
I was noticing that she seems to have a problem with walking. Is it because she is bow-legged, perhaps? She walks from side to side instead of back to front.


33 posted on 12/19/2009 6:47:21 AM PST by IceAge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: New Yawk Minute

I think she is better looking than her husband.


34 posted on 12/19/2009 6:49:26 AM PST by IceAge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: IceAge
I was noticing that she seems to have a problem with walking

More likely a weight displacement problem.

Way too much weight in the backside so it makes her walk spread legged to compensate so she stayed balanced. :)

35 posted on 12/19/2009 6:53:31 AM PST by Popman (Election 2010: Congress: your pink slips are coming ............... :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ClearBlueSky

I agree with you. I think we should address the issues and not her physiognomy nor form. I really hate it when they make fun of her.

Now..Al Franken...LOL! fire away!


36 posted on 12/19/2009 6:54:53 AM PST by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Of course, she can’t help the way she looks. However, if Michelle Obama is to be considered “attractive”, then no woman that we used to think was attractive can any longer be. The standards of female beauty have to be completely reversed. And what of the soul of someone who pretends that she has any fashion sense? The world is upside down.


37 posted on 12/19/2009 6:58:51 AM PST by Perfesser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perfesser
Of course, she can’t help the way she looks. However, if Michelle Obama is to be considered “attractive”, then no woman that we used to think was attractive can any longer be. The standards of female beauty have to be completely reversed. And what of the soul of someone who pretends that she has any fashion sense? The world is upside down.

Are you serious?

The pinheads in the media are on a year-long orgasm marathon for the Obamas, so beauty isn't beauty any more?

Turn it off, man. It's no good for you.

38 posted on 12/19/2009 7:14:24 AM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

I’m not sure you understood what I was saying. Cooking breakfast not, so see ya’ later.


39 posted on 12/19/2009 7:23:56 AM PST by Perfesser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mountn man
They attacked Sarah because the RNC spent $150,000 on clothes
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Sarah Palin made clear that the RNC did NOT NOT NOT spend $150,000 on clothing.

Clothing in various styles and sizes were purchased ( FOR THE ENTIRE FAMILY) and tried on in the privacy of their hotel rooms. All except the clothing that was appropriate and the right size were RETURNED!

40 posted on 12/19/2009 7:24:41 AM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson