I reject the rejection. I also reject the original premise about what we don’t need. They are breaking rules, having Senators and citizens argue about a bill which isn’t even what they have in the back room and which will appear on the desk of that usurper and legally logged in the Federal Register. I don’t know what you call it, but this is just pure insanity and ultimate arrogance. I don’t know what else than what’s been rejected to cure it.
>> I reject the rejection
You understand that I rejected the implication that the need for guns presumes the need for violence?
>> I don’t know what else than what’s been rejected to cure it.
The answer to that concern is above my pay grade.