Skip to comments.
Palin supports McCain '100 percent' [Palin pushes back at TMZ 'disprespect' meme]
Politico ^
| Dec. 16, 2009
| Mike Allen
Posted on 12/16/2009 4:38:39 PM PST by Al B.
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640, 641-660, 661-680 ... 801-802 next last
To: stephenjohnbanker
I haven’t even said I won’t support her. Yet some people have jumped to conclusions here based on their seeming neurosis.
If she does campaign for McCain it will make it almost impossible to back her.
That is something that I want to avoid. And yes, I’m going to voice objection if she says she will support him any way she can. I don’t want her to make it impossible for me to support her. And her real supporters will be able to grasp that concept.
641
posted on
12/18/2009 2:38:38 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Obamanism, Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Socialism, Capitalism, Americanism w/founding principles)
To: rabscuttle385
You mean like Chuckie Baldwin? How did that work out for you?
642
posted on
12/18/2009 2:38:50 PM PST
by
w. Seymour
(Third party advocates are George Soros's useful idiots.)
To: w. Seymour
I have stated that Palin made a mistake. Another person stated that she has been politically savvy and wise.
If you wish to state, that neither of these statements is true, then be my guest.
Otherwise, one of these statements is true, and once again you have not been able to avoid reality.
643
posted on
12/18/2009 2:40:29 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Obamanism, Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Socialism, Capitalism, Americanism w/founding principles)
To: DoughtyOne
Let me see, youve been attacking people who agree that her comments were unfortunate for hours on end Your problem is with the truth. You don't know what it is, you don't recognize it when you see it and you confuse it with opinion.
I've been taking so-called conservatives to task for stating that they "cannot in good conscience support" Sarah Palin because she supports the man who selected her to run for Veep on his ticket (currently in the absence of another candidate)...in spite of her conservative record and her stated positions on matters of national import.
I've also been calling out posters like you, who are incessant in your inane defenses of the people who make such statements.
I knew rabs was going to withhold support from Palin (and I told him so...right here on Free Republic) before he did it, because she's a Republican...he just needed an excuse. I could have just as easily predicted your gallant and chivalrous defense of his position, but you weren't around at the time. Out of sight, out of mind.
644
posted on
12/18/2009 2:41:31 PM PST
by
Chunga
(Any IDIOT who says Obama would be better for the country than McCain is a disgrace - Mark Levin)
To: w. Seymour
Dang it. Don’t you just hate facts.
I have a new tagline.
645
posted on
12/18/2009 2:42:36 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(People who voted for John McCain, voted for George Soros' business partner.)
To: w. Seymour; DoughtyOne; stephenjohnbanker
You mean like Chuckie Baldwin? How did that work out for you?I am perfectly comfortable with how I voted in 2008, and I would do it again if necessary.
Oh, and by the way, newbie, winning isn't everything.
Especially if it's winning at the cost of your principles and your soul. (That's called a pyrrhic victory.)
646
posted on
12/18/2009 2:42:57 PM PST
by
rabscuttle385
(Purge the RINOs! * http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
To: DoughtyOne
They are both assumptions at this time, one of which may be proven true in the future.
647
posted on
12/18/2009 2:45:25 PM PST
by
w. Seymour
(Third party advocates are George Soros's useful idiots.)
To: rabscuttle385
How is the promotion of your principles going with Obama in office, rabsy?
648
posted on
12/18/2009 2:48:17 PM PST
by
w. Seymour
(Third party advocates are George Soros's useful idiots.)
To: w. Seymour; DoughtyOne; stephenjohnbanker
How is the promotion of your principles going with Obama in office, rabsy?Quite well, actually, considering there's a huge Tea Party movement underway.
Now you can go waddle off, RINO-bot.
649
posted on
12/18/2009 2:49:59 PM PST
by
rabscuttle385
(Purge the RINOs! * http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
To: DoughtyOne
BS. Where’s your proof for such a statement?
650
posted on
12/18/2009 2:51:36 PM PST
by
w. Seymour
(Third party advocates are George Soros's useful idiots.)
To: Chunga
I have stated that Palin made a mistake. Another person stated that she has been politically savvy and wise.
If you wish to state, that neither of these statements is true, then be my guest.
Otherwise, one of these statements is true, and once again you have not been able to avoid reality.
* * * * *
So-called Conservatives, can't back a man like McCain 100%. Make of that what you will. And making the case that if a friend of Soros supports you to his own ends, you must support him to his own ends, requires no rebuttle.
I haven't been inceasently defending other posters here. I have been discussing the merits of Palin making that statement.
651
posted on
12/18/2009 2:52:11 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(People who voted for John McCain, voted for George Soros' business partner.)
To: Chunga; DoughtyOne; stephenjohnbanker
I've been taking so-called conservatives to task for stating that they "cannot in good conscience support" Sarah Palin because she supports the man who selected her to run for Veep on his ticket (currently in the absence of another candidate)...in spite of her conservative record and her stated positions on matters of national import.Because she supports "100 percent" a Vichy RINO, in spite of his left-wing, anti-conservative record and his efforts to promote amnesty, to muzzle free speech, and to impose a cap-and-tax system.
Because she supports "100 percent" a Vichy RINO, despite all the hoopla about a REAL conservative entering the primary against the aforementioned Vichy RINO.
Supporting RINOs against conservatives...isn't that something Party hacks like Newt "Scozzafava" Gingrich do?
652
posted on
12/18/2009 2:53:41 PM PST
by
rabscuttle385
(Purge the RINOs! * http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
To: w. Seymour
653
posted on
12/18/2009 2:54:52 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(People who voted for John McCain, voted for George Soros' business partner.)
To: w. Seymour
One of them is true today. One of us is unable to admit that.
654
posted on
12/18/2009 2:56:14 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(People who voted for John McCain, voted for George Soros' business partner.)
To: rabscuttle385
Well, in the meantime, pal, your boy Obama will give us nationalized health care and cap and trade. Good job, rabsky.
This is a pro-Palin conservative site. The majority here are in agreement with me on this. You are the odd man out. Slither back to DU or the Ron Paul forums or whatever rock you crawled out from under.
655
posted on
12/18/2009 2:56:27 PM PST
by
w. Seymour
(Third party advocates are George Soros's useful idiots.)
To: DoughtyOne
It’s impossible to know which is true at this time. Things will have to play out first.
656
posted on
12/18/2009 2:59:09 PM PST
by
w. Seymour
(Third party advocates are George Soros's useful idiots.)
To: rabscuttle385
McCain isn’t Scozzfava. How do the election in NY-23 turn out again?
657
posted on
12/18/2009 3:00:10 PM PST
by
w. Seymour
(Third party advocates are George Soros's useful idiots.)
To: LowOiL
I would have thrown the damned thing out Nov 6, 08. If she wanted to be incognito, why not buy a new cap?
To: w. Seymour; DoughtyOne
659
posted on
12/18/2009 3:01:19 PM PST
by
rabscuttle385
(Purge the RINOs! * http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
To: w. Seymour
The move was either in line with Conservative principles and those who support them, or it wasn’t in line with Conservative principles and was in line with those who oppose them.
660
posted on
12/18/2009 3:01:24 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(People who voted for John McCain, voted for George Soros' business partner.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640, 641-660, 661-680 ... 801-802 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson