[rabscuttle385]

I've been taking so-called conservatives to task for stating that they "cannot in good conscience support" Sarah Palin because she supports the man who selected her to run for Veep on his ticket (currently in the absence of another candidate)...in spite of her conservative record and her stated positions on matters of national import.

Because she supports "100 percent" a Vichy RINO, in spite of his left-wing, anti-conservative record and his efforts to promote amnesty, to muzzle free speech, and to impose a cap-and-tax system.

Because she supports "100 percent" a Vichy RINO, despite all the hoopla about a REAL conservative entering the primary against the aforementioned Vichy RINO.

Supporting RINOs against conservatives...isn't that something Party hacks like Newt "Scozzafava" Gingrich do?

[w. Seymour]

McCain isn’t Scozzfava. How do the election in NY-23 turn out again?

[Chunga]

Supporting RINOs against conservatives

Who's the conservative? Hayworth hasn't declared.

[Chunga]

Because she supports "100 percent" a Vichy RINO, in spite of his left-wing, anti-conservative record and his efforts to promote amnesty, to muzzle free speech, and to impose a cap-and-tax system.

Because she supports "100 percent" a Vichy RINO, despite all the hoopla about a REAL conservative entering the primary against the aforementioned Vichy RINO.

Supporting RINOs against conservatives...isn't that something Party hacks like Newt "Scozzafava" Gingrich do?

As for me, just like the owner of Free Republic,

"If she decides to run, I’ll be supporting her one hundred percent."

[stephenjohnbanker]

“Supporting RINOs against conservatives...isn’t that something Party hacks like Newt “Scozzafava” Gingrich do? “

The only difference is that McCain is FAR more powerful than Scozzbag. McCain is public enemy # 1 in the Republican party.