Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Emerging Conservative Consensus
Pajamas Media ^ | Dec. 16 | Jazz Shaw

Posted on 12/16/2009 12:31:45 PM PST by AJKauf

Ask yourself who would win in a theoretical election: Obama ’09 or Reagan ’84? Sure, President Obama’s victory last year was impressive, but his approval ratings are dropping by the hour and the late Reagan is consistently cited as one of the country’s most beloved former presidents. Perhaps Reagan wouldn’t win 49 states as in 1984, but is there any doubt, knowing what we know now, that Reagan would emerge victorious — and do so decisively?

Republicans can win big in 2010 and 2012 by talking less about social issues and more about economic liberty and federalism.....

(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: MrB
The present generation has grown up with advanced ultra-sound machines and knows that it IS A BABY that is growing inside of of pregnant woman.

As someone once said, "Any teenager who has ever bought a box of condoms KNOWS IT'S A BABY!"

61 posted on 12/17/2009 8:40:04 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Not "plausible" at all. First, you're supporting "moderates," which every sane conservative knows to be a code-word for "liberals."

No, I would describe a "moderate" as someone who gets an American Conservative Union rating of about 75 or 80, rather than a 95 or 98. A "liberal" gets about a 20, and a "left-winger" gets a 5. Let's keep it real.

And so, no matter what nice conservative words you might utter, because you refuse to return to fundamental republican principles and stand firm for them in your actions, you're guaranteeing the continued decline of the patient. Your party is dying because of consistent and ongoing compromise of fundamental American principles. And you say you're going to do nothing about it.

Incorrect. I'm doing everything I can about it. Our group threw everything we had into NY-23 to support Doug Hoffman, not Dede Scozzafava. I was personally working behind the scenes, calling people I know in the Scozzafava campaign to convince her to drop out of the race. It worked, but not quite soon enough.

Again, according to the people who run the GOP, "conservatives can't win" anywhere. The party's resources continue to be focused on pushing liberals, not true conservatives. One other thing: the GOP long ago abandoned those areas you're talking about. They refuse to use any resources to do what you say.

Again, you're wrong. In district after district, we're finding real conservative candidates and pushing them up to the top. We're making real progress in states like North Caroline, Tennessee and Pennsylvania. But we won't get to a 100 percent conservative level nationwide this year. As I said, we can't go to war with the army we wish we had. We have to go to war with the army we've got. We can make it more conservative, and we're trying.

You might be able to fool some with what you're saying, but not me. I know too much about the reality of today's Republican Party.

Oh really? In what capacity have you worked for the party, or any of its nominees? I worked for Jack Ryan's Senate campaign in 2004. If we had won that race, Barack Obama would still be an obscure state senator in Springfield, Illinois (and he'd still be working his day job as a community organizer and ACORN lawyer in Chicago).

62 posted on 12/17/2009 8:45:52 AM PST by Philo1962 (Iraq is terrorist flypaper. They go there to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Again, according to the people who run the GOP, "conservatives can't win" anywhere. The party's resources continue to be focused on pushing liberals, not true conservatives.

The GOP has only had a genuine conservative nominee for president in two elections and that was Ronald Reagan in 1980 and 1984 (Goldwater in 1964 was a pro-war, fiscal conservative, but was not a social conservative). Reagan won big in 1980 and after four years of witnessing conservatism in action the country gave him a landslide in 1984.

If you look at elections over the last 40 years, the more liberal the Republican nominee was, the worse he did.

63 posted on 12/17/2009 8:47:34 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: steve-b; P-Marlowe; wagglebee
if so-cons publicly embraced the libertarian live-and-let-live roots of conservatism

Christian conservatives realize that sin is a word for "that which injures." Sometimes, grossly injures.

Yourself, others, your family, your community, your relationship with God.

Or you can say to the alcoholic: "Live and let live, bubba."

Better yet, conservatives would better explain HOW something injures and is an unhealthy choice.

64 posted on 12/17/2009 8:51:52 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Yep.


65 posted on 12/17/2009 8:52:52 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Philo1962
I once served on my state's Republican central committee, and have worked on campaigns at every level in virtually all parts of the country. I know the score, and I know the Republican false flag scam for what it is.

Let's keep it real.

The reality is that the corruption of the GOP has invaded almost all the cells of its body politic.

American Conservative Union rating

Which do you think is the more dangerous to the sheep: A wolf in wolves' clothing, or a wolf in sheep's clothing?

66 posted on 12/17/2009 8:58:48 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Philo1962
calling people I know in the Scozzafava campaign to convince her to drop out of the race. It worked, but not quite soon enough.

It sure did work. It elected the Democrat.

Dang "third party spoilers" those Republicans. And they spent a million bucks of the rank and file's money to do it.

67 posted on 12/17/2009 9:02:03 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: xzins; P-Marlowe

Telling conservatives to “embrace libertarianism” is the same as telling them to quit being conservatives.


68 posted on 12/17/2009 9:02:05 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I want to take our party back. Going third party is what the Democrats want us to do, because it will ensure their dominance for many more years as you build a new party from the ground up. Look at how well the Green Party is doing on the left, and the Constitution Party on the right. Look at the Libertarian Party, which defies such labels as “left” and “right.” All three of them have been around for many years, and not one of them has ever won a single seat in Congress.


69 posted on 12/17/2009 9:03:03 AM PST by Philo1962 (Iraq is terrorist flypaper. They go there to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Philo1962

That’s because they lack a principled vision, just like the Republicans do.


70 posted on 12/17/2009 9:05:17 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Philo1962
I want to take our party back.

No you don't. You already said you're going to support liberals.

71 posted on 12/17/2009 9:06:39 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Well, good luck with your principled vision. The sad part is that it’s virtually identical to mine. I just have a better idea about where to apply it: take the Republican Party back from the RINOs.


72 posted on 12/17/2009 9:07:21 AM PST by Philo1962 (Iraq is terrorist flypaper. They go there to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

I deny the alleged dichotomy between “social conservatives” and “fiscal conservatives.” The same fundamental principles, the same understanding of the proper purpose and role of government, underlie both. If you are only one or the other, you are not really a conservative at all, just a would-be tyrant who happens to want to control different things than other tyrants do.

Anyway, I generally agree with the article, in that emphasizing federalism (and the limits of government) is a good approach on social issues and emphasizing personal freedom (property rights, etc.) is a good approach on economic ones.


73 posted on 12/17/2009 9:10:54 AM PST by Sloth (Pray for Obama: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Philo1962

Good luck with that. I tried for twenty years, but have accomplished more in two years from the outside. It’s a new day.


74 posted on 12/17/2009 9:25:55 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Say what?


75 posted on 12/17/2009 9:38:19 AM PST by MARTIAL MONK (I'm waiting for the POP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Social Security and other programs are in trouble because it is impossible for a Ponzi Scam to work long-term.

Fixed it for you.

76 posted on 12/17/2009 10:22:06 AM PST by steve-b (Intelligent Design -- "A Wizard Did It")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

You sound a lot like those NFL fans who expect a 16-0 year every August. The minute your team loses its first game, you’re making a pile of your pennants and stocking caps and team jerseys in the back yard, pouring gasoline on it and lighting a match.

Rather than start an expansion team, we need to fire the head coach. The team has plenty of talent.

The Tea Party movement needs to take over the Republican Party. It won’t happen in one year, but it’ll be a lot faster than building a third party from the ground up.


77 posted on 12/17/2009 10:22:15 AM PST by Philo1962 (Iraq is terrorist flypaper. They go there to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

So, in your estimation killing 50 MILLION Americans has done NOTHING that negatively impacts the economy?


78 posted on 12/17/2009 10:23:11 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Actually, the demographic trends indicated that the Goldwater mix (cut back on Big Government across the board) is the winning formula for modern times.


79 posted on 12/17/2009 10:24:33 AM PST by steve-b (Intelligent Design -- "A Wizard Did It")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Or you can say to the alcoholic: "Live and let live, bubba."

In 1919, the government said to the alcoholic, "You Are Forbidden To Do That!"

It took only a dozen years for the government to acknowledge its error -- and for the government to EVER acknowledge error proves what a BIG error it was -- and go back to the true conservative stance that personal matters are none of its business.

80 posted on 12/17/2009 10:27:19 AM PST by steve-b (Intelligent Design -- "A Wizard Did It")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson