Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alex Murphy

Thanks Alex,

I kept the image for future reference. It might be interesting to check out the book to see what the main point of their political philosophy as to how the writer thought we could revers the “Global Cooling Trend”.......

LOL


7 posted on 12/16/2009 7:15:05 AM PST by OneVike (Just a Christian waiting to go home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: OneVike
I kept the image for future reference. It might be interesting to check out the book to see what the main point of their political philosophy as to how the writer thought we could revers the “Global Cooling Trend”......

Actually Federbush does a pretty good job of staying apolitical throughout the book. It's not a bad book and it is a fast read so if you find it pick it up. As a side note, I thought the movie The Day After Tomorrow was a complete ripoff of ICE.

31 posted on 12/16/2009 8:10:52 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (I'd rather be a AGW denier than a dumbass watermelon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: OneVike; Alex Murphy
You were saying ...

I kept the image for future reference. It might be interesting to check out the book to see what the main point of their political philosophy as to how the writer thought we could revers the “Global Cooling Trend”.......

Well..., that's where you've got a mistaken impression then. There wasn't any kind of philosophy that existed back then, even when the scientists observed a real Global Cooling trend -- that this was "Anthropogenic Global Cooling"... LOL...

If you think that, you've got it all wrong.

What they did think back then, was that cooling could possibily continue and we could have either a Little Ice Age, like we did in our own history, or else we could sink further than that.

The idea, back then, was "how to cope with that..."

AND, that's a perfectly legitimate type of thinking, as to how we would cope with something like that, if the trend were to continue.

Likewise, it's legitimate to think of how we would cope with the Global Warming that has happened, if the trend were to continue.

BUT, we now see that we've entered a period of time like the Dalton Minimum, so the proper thinking now is "How do we cope with the cooling down of the temperatures and the loss of crops and the shifting of the grow zones in this county by about 150 or more miles to the south?"

There was nothing wrong with how they were thinking back then. What is wrong now, is not the "recognition of Global Warming" (because that has happened..., or else how did we get out of the idea of an "ice age" back then... LOL) -- but the "wrong thinking" is that we have been subject to "Anthropogenic Global Warming"...

46 posted on 12/16/2009 8:34:53 AM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson