Replies

"This is so hilarious to those who do understand what you're talking about."

We all understand, but fortunately most of us recognize propaganda, and Rodney King 'science.'

During your 'warm' period, here in the frigid SF Bay Area for example, we had what had been in the past unusual long hard freezes in January of '90,'91, and'92. In '91 we had a koi pond that remained solid ice for three weeks. Warming would have been truly welcome. Throughout the '90s except for '92 and '97, our June temps failed to reach 90 degrees, rather than the low 100s that had been normal until '87. This remains typical for our June weather still. Its like the thermostat got turned back by two months.

In coastal areas, temperatures have more to do with ocean temps and the prevailing winds than with other factors, and ocean temps tend to lag due to the heat reservoir effect of the oceans.

We're seeing colder temps in interior North America. Europe is currently still mostly fine because what keeps it warm is the Gulf Stream, a convection current that brings heat from the Gulf of Mexico up to Northern Europe. Similarly, the Mediterranean keeps surrounding land from large temperature swings.

You were saying ...

We all understand, but fortunately most of us recognize propaganda, and Rodney King 'science.'

Well, this "Global Warming" that you're refusing to accept as having happened (as opposed to "Anthropogenic Global Warming"), and call it "Rodney King science" -- is the same thing that Lord Monckton says is true, that many FReepers use here (i.e, his information) in regards to refuting "Anthropogenic Global Warming".

So, it would appear that you're saying that many FReepers are using Lord Monckton and his "Rodney King science"... LOL... [as a result of your "Rodney King science" statement]

In addition, you're also, as a result, accusing the other FReeper Meteorologist who agrees with the facts of Global Warming having happened during the latter part of the 20th Century, as he has so well posted to you several times.

You're saying (as a result of what you've said above) that he is also using "Rodney King science" in maintaining his position in Global Warming having happened.

In addition, he says that there are thousands of other meteorologists who agree with him in regards to Global Warming having happened, while at the same time, disagreeing with "Anthropogenic Global Warming".

So, I'm sorry, but when I see FReepers like this in their professions agreeing with the fact of Global Warming, disagreeing with Anthropogenic Global Warming and also having Lord Monckton in the same position (who is used by many other FReepers) -- I have to say that you're using "Mickey Mouse science"... LOL...