We all understand, but fortunately most of us recognize propaganda, and Rodney King 'science.'
Well, this "Global Warming" that you're refusing to accept as having happened (as opposed to "Anthropogenic Global Warming"), and call it "Rodney King science" -- is the same thing that Lord Monckton says is true, that many FReepers use here (i.e, his information) in regards to refuting "Anthropogenic Global Warming".
So, it would appear that you're saying that many FReepers are using Lord Monckton and his "Rodney King science"... LOL... [as a result of your "Rodney King science" statement]
In addition, you're also, as a result, accusing the other FReeper Meteorologist who agrees with the facts of Global Warming having happened during the latter part of the 20th Century, as he has so well posted to you several times.
You're saying (as a result of what you've said above) that he is also using "Rodney King science" in maintaining his position in Global Warming having happened.
In addition, he says that there are thousands of other meteorologists who agree with him in regards to Global Warming having happened, while at the same time, disagreeing with "Anthropogenic Global Warming".
So, I'm sorry, but when I see FReepers like this in their professions agreeing with the fact of Global Warming, disagreeing with Anthropogenic Global Warming and also having Lord Monckton in the same position (who is used by many other FReepers) -- I have to say that you're using "Mickey Mouse science"... LOL...
The reference to Lord Monckton is strictly yours.
Going along with contrived data is a notable characteristic of Rodney King ‘science.’