You must be kidding. And "intelligent design" had nothing to do with religion, right? It's pure science.
Pure science, but with serious flaws in its scientific theory. eh?
Even Gould admits it’s “dead” as a theory.
Why don't you think it is?
You do realize that you are both putting words in people's mouths, and then zapping your own absurd creation with sarcasm and biting wit?
I have read every reply so far; And I haven't seen anyone make that absurd assertion. Except you.
Yes, fundamentalists can be just as irritating fruitcakes as evos. No big surprise there. That does not make either sane, competent debate.