[GodGunsGuts]

Also, notice how tnlibertarian conveniently left out the second half of JR’s statement:

“Debate on church doctrine and or threads on specific religious matters may be best posted in the religion forum, but the defense of religious freedom, especially against those who wish to deprive us of same belongs front and center on FR....They banned God and prayer and creationism from public schools and public places, but I’ll be damned if they’re gonna ban Him or it from FR!”

[ColdWater]

Also, notice how tnlibertarian conveniently left out the second half of JR’s statement: “Debate on church doctrine and or threads on specific religious matters may be best posted in the religion forum, but the defense of religious freedom, especially against those who wish to deprive us of same belongs front and center on FR....They banned God and prayer and creationism from public schools and public places, but I’ll be damned if they’re gonna ban Him or it from FR!”

Also notice what you conveniently left out from JR's posts:

"The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. "

[metmom]

It’s always good to take things in context.

[tnlibertarian]

I didn't conveniently leave anything out. It wasn't pertinent to the fact that the article had not one iota to do with depriving anyone of religious freedom, and therefore belongs in Religion, not News/Activism, according to the quote. The rest of the quote: "They banned God and prayer and creationism from public schools and public places, but I’ll be damned if they’re gonna ban Him or it from FR!” also refers to the banning and deprivation of religious freedom. Something your article has nada to do with. So, once again, based on the criteria included in your quote, this article does not reach the standards necessary for placement in News/Activism.