Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stolen Climate E-Mails Cause A Ruckus In Congress
NPR ^ | 12/2/09 | Richard Harris

Posted on 12/02/2009 6:15:23 PM PST by ricks_place

A congressional hearing that was supposed to be a routine recap of global-warming science Wednesday turned into a fracas involving e-mails stolen from some prominent climate scientists.

The e-mails were stolen from the University of East Anglia in Britain, from one of the three labs in the world that constructs global temperature records. The private exchanges have become a goldmine for skeptics who argue that global warming is a plot rather than a real man-made problem.

At Wednesday's hearing before a House select committee, Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) called for an investigation of the e-mails. He said at best, official reports about global warming will now need to be reviewed.

"At worst, it's junk science and it's part of a massive international scientific fraud," he said. And not just fraud: "There's increasing evidence of scientific fascism that's going on. And I think, as policymakers who are making decisions about the state of the American economy for the next several generations, we ought to have accurate science."

President Obama's top science adviser, John Holdren, agreed that the e-mails should be thoroughly investigated. At issue is whether they provide evidence of scientific malfeasance, or just bad manners.

(Excerpt) Read more at npr.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climaquiddick; climategate; congress; cruminals; democrats; globalwarming; gorebullwarming; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
And now, the leaked e-mails raise doubts about some of the climate scientists, too. - NPR!
1 posted on 12/02/2009 6:15:23 PM PST by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ricks_place

Note to state run media........the train is leaving the station........


2 posted on 12/02/2009 6:17:09 PM PST by MamaLucci (It's Mourning In America........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place

Did they mention they were stolen. /s


3 posted on 12/02/2009 6:18:19 PM PST by Ramcat (Thank You American Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place

Does anyone know if this is the first NPR mention of Climategate?


4 posted on 12/02/2009 6:19:13 PM PST by Mamzelle (Who is Kenneth Gladney? (Don't forget to bring your cameras))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place

At issue is whether they provide evidence of scientific malfeasance, or just bad manners.”

I find this statement suspect. Based on what we’ve read so far, is there any question of malfeasance? Is it possible that facist warmers are going to find some way to discount this as “bad manners”? The media black out is certainly buying them the time they need to come up with an argument, isn’t it.


5 posted on 12/02/2009 6:19:16 PM PST by Kimberly GG (Join Me In BOYCOTTING all ObamaTV!! (Change the channel or do so and then turn tv off!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place; Defendingliberty; WL-law; Normandy; TenthAmendmentChampion; FrPR; enough_idiocy; ...
Thanx !

 



Beam Me to Planet Gore !

6 posted on 12/02/2009 6:19:27 PM PST by steelyourfaith (Time to prosecute Al Gore now that fellow scam artist Bernie Madoff is in stir.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place

>> Richard Harris : At issue is whether they provide evidence of scientific malfeasance, or just bad manners.

Condescending punk.


7 posted on 12/02/2009 6:19:51 PM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place

“involving e-mails stolen from some prominent climate scientists”

Prove it you ba$tard$.


8 posted on 12/02/2009 6:19:55 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place
What do you suppose Daniel Ellsberg's take is on this?

Lamh Foistenach Abu!
9 posted on 12/02/2009 6:22:15 PM PST by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines, RVN 1969. St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place
Stolen Climate E-Mails Cause A Ruckus In Congress

Not a tenth of the Ruckus they ought to be causing IMHO!

10 posted on 12/02/2009 6:22:17 PM PST by Bigun ("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramcat
Did they mention they were stolen. /s

/s acknowledged. They Did, and they were not! The source of these emails is a whistle blower, not a thief or a hacker.

11 posted on 12/02/2009 6:23:03 PM PST by outofstyle (There's a rake at the gates of Hell tonight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place

Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI)

Sounds like a good guy. Not just a run-of-the-mill hack.


12 posted on 12/02/2009 6:24:18 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG
Richard Harris, another Soros plant, using carefully chosen terms like "stolen" and "private" when he knows they do not apply here.

These were not private, personal email accounts. They were accounts having to do with their "research"--and I use that term advisedly now. Since these accounts were associated with their publicly-funded research, the accounts are subject to FOI. These swindlers had been stalling legit FOI for ages, some of the emails even talk about deleting these emails if FOI kicked in, which is a violation of the law. To even discuss doing such a thing is probably also against the law--conspiracy to destroy evidence.--

Notice none of them have even hinted that they'd take legal action.

13 posted on 12/02/2009 6:25:10 PM PST by Mamzelle (Who is Kenneth Gladney? (Don't forget to bring your cameras))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place
This is the first time I've seen the word fascist linked to the warmists. Quite appropriate.

For those on facebook, consider demanding an investigation into the CRUminals.

14 posted on 12/02/2009 6:25:47 PM PST by C210N (A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take everything you have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place
A congressional hearing that was supposed to be a routine recap of global-warming science Wednesday turned into a fracas ...

Don't ya just hate when that happens?

All they wanted to do was ram-rod another astronomically high tax increase up the a$$es of the American people and they got confronted with a gall darn fracas.

It just ain't fair, I tell you. Just ain't fair.

15 posted on 12/02/2009 6:26:49 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

I’m thinking that these weren’t hacked, but that it had to be insider or a very well-connected hacker indeed. How would the hacker know what to hack, and how to hack this?


16 posted on 12/02/2009 6:26:54 PM PST by Mamzelle (Who is Kenneth Gladney? (Don't forget to bring your cameras))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
Merci, Mamzelle! Did not not know that!

Lamh Foistenach Abu!
17 posted on 12/02/2009 6:28:58 PM PST by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines, RVN 1969. St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place

President Obama’s top science adviser, John Holdren, agreed that the e-mails should be thoroughly investigated. At issue is whether they provide evidence of scientific malfeasance, or just bad manners.

Hodren is involved as well as most of this administration and congress. YOU ALL LIE! Call for prosecutions!


18 posted on 12/02/2009 6:28:58 PM PST by ronnie raygun (Leaders who refuse to lead will be lead by the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place

NPR seems to be playing up the fact that these are leaks...as in “stolen”, even though they are not private under the Freedom of Information Act.

NPR= No Progress under Reagan


19 posted on 12/02/2009 6:30:47 PM PST by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place
As a scientist I have witnessed several full blown investigations, when even a hint of deception was raised.
20 posted on 12/02/2009 6:33:41 PM PST by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson