I understand your perspective.
However,
GIVEN THE PARTICULAR FACTS in so many thousands of cases . . .
AS WELL AS THOSE CASES WHERE UFO’s have been observed INVOLVED in the mutilations
AND A VERY FEW of THOSE cases where ET type critters have also been seen on the ground involved in the mutilation cases . . .
IT’S NOT THAT FAR FETCHED.
And, it’s quite a reasonable line of thinking.
###########
It would be somewhat akin to an Islamic terrorist attack . . .
asking folks to not say it had anything to do with Muslims.
One problem with that. Evidence.
Where is the evidence for UFOs or ETs being involved with these cases? So far, alien involvement (or even their very existence, for that matter) is pure conjecture and theory. Nothing more.
Throwing theory and conjecture (especially of such a mind-bending nature) into the mix with the observed and documented facts on the ground does nothing but tend to invalidate all of the very good evidence that's been gathered.
I have my own theories as to what's causing all of these cattle mutilations, but why introduce that into a discussion about the actual facts, unless I want to start an argument about something that I can't prove the existence of?
I don't know what's "farfetched", except things that have absolutely zero evidence of reality. For all we know, humans with heretofore unknown technologies may be the ones carrying out these mutilations. Maybe it's an advanced race of beings from off-planet. How on earth are we to say what it is without hard evidence?
I'm comfortable in just knowing the facts at hand, until such time as someone has actual proof of who is doing this, and how.
Sure, I'd like to know what the answer to this mystery is. Don't we all --- but we do the search for truth an injustice by throwing our unfounded theories into the mix.