[Biggirl]

Could this be a possible preview to possible problems come the day after Election 2010?

[Chi-townChief]

Owens was possibly sworn in under false pretenses so it still may get interesting if the votes are there for the Hoffmeister.

[Mount Athos]

the title makes my head hurt

[mysterio]

Did Steve McGough ever study verb tenses?

[downtownconservative]

Speaking of Collin’s healthcare reversal, he was just chosen as one of the expendable by Pelosi. I don’t really think he expects to win in 2010 and return to the House.

[faucetman]

Turn this around.

Hoffman ahead by 5,000 votes and has had the voting machines impounded. He asks the Democrats and Owens to concede so Hoffman can be sworn in by Pelosi so he can vote against the health care bill.

What are the chances that Owens would concede?

ZERO.

Why are we so STUPID?

[SWAMPSNIPER]

He sure did! We’ve got to start fighting things out to the absolute end!

[stephenjohnbanker]

“Could this be a possible preview to possible problems come the day after Election 2010? “

Not possible, certain. Because we don’t care enough to fight back, and Obama/ACORN knows it.

[thefactor]

I will not patronize people who want me to read their stuff if they don’t care enough to edit what they writed.

[magellan]

Concessions are not legally binding. The only thing that is legally binding is the state’s Secretary of State certification of the election result.