>>Darwinists are anti-creation not pro-science. Evidence means nothing to them in the slightest, especially if it shows that creationists line of thinking appears to be more accurate.<<
There is no such thing as a “Darwinist.” There are those who understand science and attribute the early genesis of what is now The Theory of Evolution to Darwin. Just as there are no “Copernicists” nor “Einsteinists” nor “Curieists.”
As far as creationism having “evidence” — when you introduce me to the corporeal ID and it (or He) tells us how to use what it does every single time in a definable and predictable way, you have just theology.
Your understanding of science is based in the depths of your apologetics and Luddite folklore, not on the actual practice.
Evolution is a hoax, there is no presentable evidence to show a change of form from one morphology to another. Lots of bones, lots of ideas, no factual corroboration. And a problem I think is that people confuse ‘adaptation’ with ‘evolution’. One exists and has been observed, one does not and hasn’t.
While it is expected that those who have no or little belief in God would find this Theory appealing, it is saddening to hear professed Christians supporting it.
You will ndeed someday have your intorduction to the Creator, hope that works out for you.
It is easy for you to call a person of Faith a Luddite....But Science is a great tool. Lots of good, useful things have been discovered. A Creation-believing Christian (which SHOULD be the only kind) is not anti-science. Not at all. Such a person just understands and believes that God has described to us how the world and life began. And a man-made Theory just doesn’t stand up.