Justice will be served...as long as the Rat doesn’t mess things up!
I love good news!!
Is SCOTUS simply racist or also anti-Islam? I would not want to jump to any conclusions.....
Seven years was to long. They should have excuted him within 72 hours. That seems to be the magic number these days. We need to start getting real about this stuff.
Anohter Muzzy terrorist scumbag who is going to get his 72 Helen Thomases.
Good! That’s a step in the right direction, at least.
They could be jumping to conclusions....
Obama was hoping to be let off the hook by the SCOTUS on this one. Expect him to now intervene.
I am sure the “alleged mass shooter” (/s) will yell “Allah Akbar” before he is put to death.
I hate to see them waste good drugs like that, when there’s still lead available.
I say we tie him to a big post about 2500 meters from the executioner, and let the guy get some practice in against a live target.
Just the near miss value would be sensational, as this guy realized how his victims felt in a way nobody else ever would.
Heck, I’d pay extra for about five near misses just so the prick could experience the terror of those projectiles going by less than one or two feet off target.
Yay!!!!!!!!!!!
Though I’m sure the NY Times headline tomorrow will be:
VIRGINIA EXECUTE MUHAMMAD.
Good. Let’s ROLL!!!
All of them should die for their crimes. Muhammed will die Tuesday, Akbar has been sentenced to die...and I belive Hasan will be too.
Sadly though, I do not expect the current occupant of the White House to form in direct, meaningful, or effective response to the situation of these enemies operating within.
THE AUDACITY OF TRUTH ABOUT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA'S UPBRINGING
Injection?
This situation calls for a rough-pine gallows.
But it did have something to say:
JUSTICES' FULL STATEMENT:This case highlights once again the perversity of executing inmates before their appeals process has been fully concluded. Under our normal practice, Muhammad’stimely petition for certiorari would have been reviewed at our Conference on November 24, 2009. Virginia hasscheduled his execution for November 10, however, so we must resolve the petition on an expedited basis unless we grant a temporary stay. By denying Muhammad’s stay application, we have allowed Virginia to truncate ourdeliberative process on a matter—involving a death row inmate—that demands the most careful attention. This result is particularly unfortunate in light of the limited time Muhammad was given to make his case in the District Court.
I continue to believe that the Court would be wise to adopt a practice of staying all executions scheduled inadvance of the completion of our review of a capital defendant’s first application for a federal writ of habeas corpus.See, e.g., Emmett v. Kelly, 552 U. S. 942 (2007) (STEVENS, J., joined by GINSBURG, J., respecting denial of certiorari); Breard v. Greene, 523 U. S. 371, 379 (1998) (STEVENS, J., dissenting). Such a practice would give meaningful effect to the distinction Congress has drawn between first andsuccessive habeas petitions. See 28 U. S. C. §2244(b). It would also serve the interests of avoiding irreversibleerror, facilitating the efficient management of our docket, and preserving basic fairness by ensuring death row inmates receive the same procedural safeguards that ordinary inmates receive.
Having reviewed petitioner’s claims, I do not dissent from the Court’s decision to deny certiorari. “I do, however, remain firmly convinced that no State should be allowed to foreshorten this Court’s orderly review of . . . first-time habeas petition[s] by executing prisoners before that review can be completed.” Emmett, 552 U. S., at 943.
Tape the execution and funeral. Bury him wrapped in bacon. Show Hasan the tape.
Kaine has said he sees no reason to stop this.
It will be good news if this piece of something that passed through the digestive tract of a pig actually becomes worm food.
I won’t believe it until it’s over. This thing has double protection.