Posted on 11/07/2009 8:28:39 PM PST by markomalley
Contact information: Washington, D.C. Office:
2113 Rayburn House Office Building,
District of Columbia 20515-1802
Phone: (202) 225-6636
Fax:
(202) 225-1988
4640 South Carrollton Avenue, Suite 120
New Orleans, Louisiana 70119
Phone: (504) 483-2325
Fax: (504) 483-7944
New Orleans Office:
4640 South Carrollton Avenue, Suite 120
New Orleans, Louisiana 70119
Phone: (504) 483-2325
Fax: (504) 483-7944
It would be appropriate to let him know how much we appreciate his vote. Not for the value of the vote, but because he gave the Dhims cover to say that it was "bipartisan."
“Ho
Ho
Ho Chi Minh
The NLF is gonna Win.”
Uncle Ho wins thanks to this Bastard.
Cao is”in the Wire”.
When a person comes from the s($#@ he came from and then votes to put us back there kick him out. If the Dem’s have 280 what’s 1 more.
Given what you’d just told me concerning this NO R, thought you’d find this discussion of interest. Of course I assume you haven’t been here & gone, to avoid the unruly mob. LOL!!
IIRC, Cao also voted for the “stimulus” plan, or almost did. He’s always been flaky with high-profile votes. No matter, like Paulie, we won’t see him around any more after next year.
This stupid SOB fled communism in Vietnam only to implement it in the US.
VC IN THE WIRE!!!...
yes it did it allows these dems to go out and say it was bipartisan..
are you kidding they are going to pass this bill wake up this country is being taking over by the statist
Makes one wonder what kind of stuff he had in his closest?
The Left operates on the same level as the mafia and other criminal groups. Sometime it is better to leave someone intact and then blackmail him into doing what they need done.
Or maybe this guy is just a F##kin jerkoff anyways.
Too bad. If he can't take the heat, he needs to stay out of the kitchen. He was WRONG and needs to hear about it.
Look, I know there is a lot going on, but really, if any thinking citizen thinks that 177-1 is “bipartisan” they are too stupid to understand or become educated about more complex issues that plague us and our republic.
Thinking people who have initiative to look at 177-1 and understand that is NOT bipartisan are intelligent enough to know that socialism sucks.
Stupid sheeple who can not do that are just going to believe what Katie Couric or Chuck Gibson tell them anyway.
I’ve written to the heretic ... Thanks for the contact information ...
Who it running against him. It is time for the idiot to go!
“...Treason is a little over the top, don’t you think?...”
“...He voted the wishes of his constituents, not his party leaders...”
“...39 Dems voted against the bill. Are they traitors, too?...”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The charges of treason do not rise from voting against their constituents;
they charges of treason rise from voting against the Constitution;
and therefore violating their oath of office.
Did the democrats who voted ‘nay’ vote against the Constitution? (no)
They may have voted ‘nay’ for all the wrong reasons
(i.e. to save their own political careers), but nevertheless,
they did not vote to support an unconstitutional bill.
When someone takes a solemn oath to support and defend the Constitution, shouldn’t breaking that oath be taken seriously?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
As required by Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution,
Members of Congress shall be bound by oath or affirmation
to support the Constitution. Representatives, delegates,
and the resident commissioner all take the oath of office
on the first day of the new Congress, immediately after
the House has elected its Speaker. The Speaker of the
House administers the oath of office as follows:
“I, (name of Member), do solemnly swear (or affirm)
that I will support and defend the Constitution of
the United States against all enemies, foreign or
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance
to the same; that I take this obligation freely,
without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion;
and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties
of the office on which I am about to enter.
So help me God.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I really don’t understand what it is about this that you don’t get.
Greg, if you think DIABLO Scozzy would have voted ‘no’ on Pelosi-care once she had gotten sworn in, then you have NO clue. Just because this hussy had a ‘R’ next to her name does not mean she would have voted with Republicans, especially when her own ideology was and is far closer to Pelosi’s than Bachmann’s.
And to blame Sarah Palin for Pelosi-care’s passage is just plain stupid.
Line busy. Folks must be sending many congrats!
“...The blame for the loss rests on Palin...”
-
You have lost your mind (assuming you ever had one).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.