Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exit82
Well, in 2010, our job will be to see that there are no Blue Dogs re-elected to Congress.

True, they're all Dims. And they most always count up the votes and decide, when they are sure of enough votes, well, these Blue Dogs can vote against the bill, and these must vote for it. Then, when campaigning for re-election, Blue Dogs can claim to have voted against some number of bills that were unpopular in their districts, but that still passed.

And I do think the Republican who voted Yes is from a fairly heavily black district, and might have had permission to vote Yes if his vote would not matter, which if would not have.

It's just a game, so all Blue Dogs who can be defeated should be.

294 posted on 11/07/2009 8:37:48 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]


To: Will88

Everyone needs to remember that every last Blue Dog voted to make Pelosi Speaker and that is all we need to know — all of them need to be targets.

I agree with you that Cao was told to vote Yes after it was clear his vote wouldn’t make a difference. They took a page out of Pelosi’s playbook as she does that all the time to try and give the Dems cover.


435 posted on 11/07/2009 8:59:29 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Coburn - Senate 2010 ! Take Back the House/Senate! Stop ZERO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson