Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Will88

I thought maybe the newbie voted “Yea” to preserve the rights of the minority to challenge the bill’s vote in the future. I recall some kind of arcane rule about that. Since he was the new guy, he drew the short straw.

If not, he’s a one termer.You don’t buck the party on your first vote.

We only needed two more Blue Dogs.

Well, in 2010, our job will be to see that there are no Blue Dogs re-elected to Congress.

We can’t fence sit anymore. The battle is joined and there is less than one year to accomplish the task.

Buckle up—it’s gonna be a bumpy ride.

And remember—Democrats are the enemy of freedom.


225 posted on 11/07/2009 8:30:32 PM PST by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: exit82
Well, in 2010, our job will be to see that there are no Blue Dogs re-elected to Congress.

True, they're all Dims. And they most always count up the votes and decide, when they are sure of enough votes, well, these Blue Dogs can vote against the bill, and these must vote for it. Then, when campaigning for re-election, Blue Dogs can claim to have voted against some number of bills that were unpopular in their districts, but that still passed.

And I do think the Republican who voted Yes is from a fairly heavily black district, and might have had permission to vote Yes if his vote would not matter, which if would not have.

It's just a game, so all Blue Dogs who can be defeated should be.

294 posted on 11/07/2009 8:37:48 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson