Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The GOP elite’s $1 million object lesson — and the message of NY-23
Michellemalkin.com ^ | 11/4/2009 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 11/04/2009 3:07:13 AM PST by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: Once-Ler
Were you not part of that contingent of disenchanted freepers who constantly bemoaned how much "hate" was on this site and left in a huff to post on one of those irrelevant sites where, frankly, no one bothered to actually read or post anything? And now you reappear to lecture us on the finer points of embracing liberal Republicans.

Get over yourself. You do not have a lock on any great electoral strategy. Rudy Guliani refused to endorse Scozzy even after encouraged to do so by Newt. I guess he shares some Republican death wish to alienate moderates.

By refusing to acknowledge the insuperable odds Hoffman overcame to lose by 3 in a district won comfortably by Obama reveals your agenda.

61 posted on 11/04/2009 5:20:00 AM PST by hcmama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Once-Ler
It helps when the GOP candidate drops out”

Umm..the ultra liberal GOP candidate dropped out because she fell behind in the polls to Hoffman.

Headlines last week were Hoffman had more money than Scuzzy.”

Headlines also said Scozzafava received a staggering $900,000 for the GOP. That is far more than most House members receive during their campaigns, especially since the RNCC is reportedly left with only $4 million in their coffers after squandering their money on the ACORN backer, and still have 200 GOP congressmen to support in next years elections. Talk about stupid.

62 posted on 11/04/2009 5:25:51 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

NAILED IT! RIGHT ON!!!


63 posted on 11/04/2009 5:33:21 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
I think the bigger unaddressed issue here is who paid off the NY23 GOP to put up Dede? A left of liberal leftist as a republican? Masqueraded her around as a “moderate?”

C’mon...I want to know who threw the election and can they go to jail for it.

64 posted on 11/04/2009 5:42:07 AM PST by EBH (it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Anyone have another link to the Republican video. It says “this video removed by user.”


65 posted on 11/04/2009 5:46:45 AM PST by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

According to Rove, such special election candidates are selected by the party leaders. in this case it was a private meeting in a pizza parlor.

A poster here said it was a red had society lady who tapped her dear friend Dede to be annointed. (if true this red hat society of old ladies not not as benign as one would have thought)

The NY23 GOP needs to oust their incompetents.


66 posted on 11/04/2009 5:48:24 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: WalterSkinner

I don’t buy conspiracies and never have. I think the message here is that just as there are perhaps 5-10% of hard core pro-lifers who will not vote for any candidate even if he is 99% pure on other issues, so too there are a bunch of RINOs for whom abortion is their holy grail-—they want all the benies of GOP stability, national security, and financial soundness, without any of the social discipline.


67 posted on 11/04/2009 5:49:01 AM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: LS

..it may be just that simple


68 posted on 11/04/2009 5:52:09 AM PST by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt

No, stop with the liberal/left spin. He “succeeded” by losing? No, he managed to show that he vastly out-pulled the RINO, and if the social-libs would have backed him, he would have won. But that’s a big “if.” The fact is, he lost-—Scuzzy would have lost BIGGER. So the issue isn’t whether a conservative can beat a RINO. The issue is, how do we as conservatives hold the line and yet STILL offer a package that allows the “social liberals” to ditch THEIR “principles.” It is an important question. Hoffman obviously didn’t have the answer, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t an answer.


69 posted on 11/04/2009 5:52:58 AM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
are selected by the party leaders.

So who got paid off?

70 posted on 11/04/2009 5:53:06 AM PST by EBH (it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: This_far
"We know that RINOs won't win without conservatives. Is the reverse true? So far, Santorum, Talent, and now Hoffman suggest you need to have a lot going for you besides "pure conservatism" to win."

Where'd YOU go? I said this already. I don't think "more conservatism" is the answer, but rather, how do you sell all the OTHER aspects of conservatism to social liberals so they will provide the winning margin? The problem is social liberals want all the benefits of conservatism (security through national defense, strong economy, safe streets) without any of the pain of discipline (man/woman marriage, no abortion, death penalty).

71 posted on 11/04/2009 5:55:15 AM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Once-Ler
A lot of clueless conservatives who sent money to Hoffman, and read the polls yesterday are saying the same thing.

Clueless! Do you have a mirror handy.

This whole process wasn't about who was going to win this election. The Dems getting one more seat to add to the substantial majority means nothing.

This election was about sending a message to the GOP that conservatives are tired of contributing time and money to an organization that is going to send it to our ideological opposites. If the GOP failed to get that message, they will certainly lose a few more elections.

72 posted on 11/04/2009 5:59:20 AM PST by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: IM2MAD

Yes, Owens will stand for reelection, and don’t forget, he ran against the public option.


73 posted on 11/04/2009 5:59:39 AM PST by kara37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
In order to win elections, we must appeal to moderates and independents.

and work on getting 51% of the voters to consider themselves conservative.

74 posted on 11/04/2009 6:01:37 AM PST by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GnuHere
"Didn’t she (intentionally) resign too late to have it removed?"

Yep..it went exactly as planned...45% of the electorate voted Conservative. 6% voted Republican. That 6% is what gave us the Dem. People who didn't want the Dem but did not pay attention to the news of her dropping out is what elected the dem....

The "GOP" can not be happy but the controlling Dem/Rep totalitarian oligarchy at the top is. Another loss for the people against a run away government.

75 posted on 11/04/2009 6:02:05 AM PST by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Once-Ler

“Scuzzy would have voted with the GOP 40% of the time.”

Evidence? She wouldn’t even commit to staying an R.

“I believe that. rat is the new conservatism at FR.”

Huh?


76 posted on 11/04/2009 6:02:46 AM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Until a Tom Delay is RNC chair...this stuff will continue.


77 posted on 11/04/2009 6:03:41 AM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

“I’d like to know who had the idea to leave Scozzafava on the ticket. She drew more than enough away to put the Conservative over the top ...that is what gave the election to the dems. Someone should be taken to court over it. “

I am more interested in knowing rather than who in the local GOP got here on the ticket than who in the national GOP RNC gave her the $900,000 to run attack ads on Hoffman. My suspicion is Steele, but in any case, the GOP needs to investigate thoroughly and fire the people who did this.

It cost the GOP a seat in the House, was a terrible waste of money and will wind up drying up funds like mine who will refuse to contribute to the national party as they will likely do this again(like in Crist in Florida).


78 posted on 11/04/2009 6:11:06 AM PST by bestintxas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mo

“Until a Tom Delay is RNC chair...this stuff will continue”

I think Dick Armey would be better.


79 posted on 11/04/2009 6:12:07 AM PST by bestintxas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Once-Ler
Scuzzy would have voted with the GOP 40% of the time.

Do you think it would be asking too much (before contributing $900,000 to an candidate) that the GOP have a minimum standard that the candidate vote with them 51% of the time?

Do you think it is a viable long term concept to support people who are going to vote with your opponent 60% of the time?

80 posted on 11/04/2009 6:19:41 AM PST by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson