Skip to comments.
Judge Carter Ruling on MTD
scribd ^
| 10/29/09
| Judge Carter
Posted on 10/29/2009 10:19:10 AM PDT by Elderberry
Judge Carter Ruling on MTD
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: article2section1; birthcertificate; birthers; carter; certifigate; naturalborncitizen; nbc; obama; obamaisfafraud; obamathugs; orly; orlytaitz; romney4obama; romneyantigop; romneybotshere; romneybotsvsbirthers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 661-670 next last
To: stockpirate; rocco55; thouworm; rxsid; GOPJ; Fred Nerks; null and void; george76; PhilDragoo; ...
. . . . . Article and #29.
.
41
posted on
10/29/2009 10:40:28 AM PDT
by
LucyT
To: Perdogg
Doesn’t Alan Keyes have standing because Obama should not have been allowed to run for the Senate? It’s not just the BC. What passport did he travel on? Did he attend college as a foreign student?
42
posted on
10/29/2009 10:40:37 AM PDT
by
bukkdems
(When we end our dependence on oil, what will we do without plastic?)
To: Grunthor
LOL! Did Carter say mean things about Orly as well? Well, he did use the phrase "improper and unethical" (to describe her conduct in asking her supporters to call the Judge).
There may be more, I haven't read the whole opinion yet.
To: MilspecRob
Bet you had an orgasm posting that, didn’t ya!
44
posted on
10/29/2009 10:40:46 AM PDT
by
Las Vegas Ron
(Oath keepers + The NRA = FReeRepublic (.com baby))
To: 1rudeboy
I believe the new theory is “No controlling legal authority”, but that is only for Republicians.
45
posted on
10/29/2009 10:42:15 AM PDT
by
ClayinVA
("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
To: Just mythoughts
WHY is the requirement place upon anyone else but the candidate?
For obvious reasons. We don't want sore losers clogging up the courts with lawsuits when they don't get the results they want.
46
posted on
10/29/2009 10:42:22 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Sarah Palin-Jim DeMint 2012 - Liz Cheney for Sec of State - Duncan Hunter SecDef)
To: Grunthor
The decree regarding what would take place from Moses seat was long ago foretold. And do I think this Orly is competent well I can only test the fruit. That is ok you will discover in due time who took Moses seat. He was the first lawgiver and Christ said that some would replace him with their own version of the law.
To: The Sons of Liberty
mob rule (majority vote) trumps the Constitution
damn shame, it was a good run while we lasted
48
posted on
10/29/2009 10:42:42 AM PDT
by
silverleaf
(Ours is the only country on earth with a ventriloquist dummy for President)
To: Elderberry
So what happens if Superbozo runs for a second term? Will we get to prevent him from taking office then since we seem to have no standing now? Or will he get to run purely and merely because he completed a first term, albeit fraudulently in the minds of many people?
49
posted on
10/29/2009 10:43:58 AM PDT
by
bergmeid
To: bukkdems
I think Alam Keyes has standing, but the burden is on Alan to prove that he was adversely affected.
50
posted on
10/29/2009 10:44:06 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Sarah Palin-Jim DeMint 2012 - Liz Cheney for Sec of State - Duncan Hunter SecDef)
To: Grunthor
Did Carter say mean things about Orly as well? Yes. There's a whole section on "Conduct of Plaintiffs' Counsel". See pages 28 and 29.
Comment #52 Removed by Moderator
To: Irisshlass
To: Perdogg
For obvious reasons. We don't want sore losers clogging up the courts with lawsuits when they don't get the results they want.Is this the 'royal' we? These people took oaths to uphold and defend the Constitution. IF they knowingly LIED then they will be held to account. NOT by me or you but the ONE that bestowed the blessing on this nation so many snuff at and elect a stranger to rule over them.
To: bergmeid
His 2012 opponents likely have standing on certain causes of actions pre-election.
To: Elderberry
“Now we attack all Natural Born Americans.”
56
posted on
10/29/2009 10:47:22 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
To: Elderberry
That’s a shocker. /s
I’m sure the appeal will be filed withing days
57
posted on
10/29/2009 10:47:41 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: Just mythoughts
“For there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known” Luke 12:2.
58
posted on
10/29/2009 10:47:46 AM PDT
by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: The Sons of Liberty
"He stated that over 69 million people wanted the usurper and he wouldn’t overthrow him"Did he really say that? That's pretty bizarre- if 69 million people voted to murder someone, would that make it OK?
What does it matter what one or 69 million people think- the constitution can be overridden because 69million people want to? Doesn't that require a CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION?
59
posted on
10/29/2009 10:48:28 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(I live in fear that one of my typos becomes a freeper catchphrase...I'm series!)
To: LibertyRocks
Yeah it’s not funny... I guess the guest on o’reilly was correct. It was litigated before it was. Sheesh...
60
posted on
10/29/2009 10:48:31 AM PDT
by
Freedom2specul8
(I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 661-670 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson