Posted on 10/29/2009 10:19:10 AM PDT by Elderberry
Judge Carter Ruling on MTD
I never said the left would eliminate him, I said IMO he would be eliminated. It would be by those who orchestrated the changes. If they don’t and he is removed, all the changes will be backed out. If he is killed, those programs stay and Biden takes over per succession of an assassinated President. That is my point. It has nothing to do with what the left or right think, it is an agenda above us all.
You're going to base an appeal on dicta?
The chances of prevailing on an appeal that is based solely on dicta within a judicial opinion, are exactly 0.0%.
So is denying folks access to the next to last box. That's not helpful at all.
Don't worry. She'll have plenty more time to devote to her dental practice after she's been disbarred.
The defendants had not been properly served until July. Long after Obama was sworn in.
I think D’Onfrio might be able to get there, but they will not hear the case.
Well then Orly has nothing to worry about and she’ll win on appeal, wont’ she? What is the date of appointment are you using? He was elected by the Electoral College in Dec. 08 and the votes certified by the Congress in Jan. and sworn in Jan. 20 with another swearing on Jan. 21.
The ‘elected by the people’ was only one of other things written in the section by the Judge.
When I see an obscenity like you or the other obamanoids, I name it. Next question?
Oh, please, officer are *taught* the differences. At least I was. I also gave briefings, to mixed enlisted and officer groups, about the need to disobey unlawful orders, that is that the enlisted oath to "obey orders" only means "lawful orders".
The Court pointed out in its opinion that the outcome may have been different had plaintiffs not waited around until after Obama was sworn in to bring their claim. Yet another screw up from plaintiffs' counsel.
No. Judge Carter induced Orly to do a revised service. It was never found that the original service was faulty. The Defence and Judge want it so, cos then they could treat Obama as a sitting President, and not as nomineee.
No. Judge Carter induced Orly to do a revised service. It was never found that the original service was faulty. The Defence and Judge want it so, cos then they could treat Obama as a sitting President, and not as nomineee.
21st Jan he completed a correct Oath of Office.
OK.
That one’s funny.
Actually it says that the House has the "sole Power of Impeachment", and that the Senate has the "sole Power to try all Impeachments". But it also says: "The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."
It no where says that ineligible persons can *be* President. If someone is not eligible, they can't be President, in spite of any oath taking or electing to the contrary. If they aren't President, then Impeachment cannot be the proper remedy.
Secondly, which of the causes for impeachment listed above does "not eligible?" come under? It's a not a crime to not be eligible, not even a misdomeanor. It's not Treason to not be eligible, and there have been no formal accusations of Bribery.
Congress has no rights, only powers. They have the power to impeach and try a President, but not an ineligible usurper. They could hold hearings on the matter, issue subpoenas and so forth. But they won't.
Guidlines? It's bright line law, by it's own terms, the Supreme Law.
No, I'll tell you what she needs to do.
She needs to make a TV show modeled on "Judge Judy," called "Judge Orly."
She judges civil disputes, and then gives a anesthesia-free root-canal to whoever loses.
Can you imagine the ratings she'd get for that?
I'd watch it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.