To: jessduntno
I think you meant to say “reversible.” What is evident is that as recently as 2005, the Supreme Court affirmed the body of Commerce Clause jurisprudence, and was joined by the second most “originalist” justice on the bench. If you don’t comprehend what that means, then you don’t understand the judiciary.
10 posted on
10/16/2009 8:45:14 AM PDT by
Huck
("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
To: Huck
"I think you meant to say reversible. What is evident is that as recently as 2005, the Supreme Court affirmed the body of Commerce Clause jurisprudence, and was joined by the second most originalist justice on the bench. If you dont comprehend what that means, then you dont understand the judiciary." Thanks...you made my point for me...you knew what I meant because it is true...and what does my comprehension have to do with this?
Honest answer, now;
True or false; this is not irreversible.
21 posted on
10/16/2009 9:03:31 AM PDT by
jessduntno
(Tell Obama to STFU - Stop The Federal Usurpation.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson