Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meghan McCain runs into backlash over photograph
CNN ^ | 10/15/09 | staff (no pun intended)

Posted on 10/15/2009 7:15:04 AM PDT by pissant

(CNN) – Meghan McCain says she's ready to quit Twitter all together after generating a wave of criticism from users of the popular social networking site Wednesday night for posting a picture of herself in a tank top that left little to the twitterverse's imagination.

The controversy began quietly enough when McCain, the vocal daughter of the former Republican presidential candidate, tweeted that her self described "spontaneous" night in included reading a biography of the iconic artist Andy Warhol and ordering takeout.

It was there the 24-year old McCain posted the photo of herself wearing a tank top that generated the subsequent controversy .

(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: boobs; booby; idiot; jubtabulous; meghanislarge; meghanmccain; meghanspuppies; nomanwilllayher; rabscuttlesgirl; rinoette; stupidpeople; twit; wastedmammaries
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 321-338 next last
To: pburgh01

“Sounds like you need to get l*id friend. You have woman issues, maybe bitter about the prom queen turning you down. Let it go.”

Irrelevant! Everything I’m saying could be said by the world’s handsomest man. Why is it so difficult for people to remain objective when sex and looks are involved?


261 posted on 10/15/2009 12:01:18 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa

No, there is a difference between saying someone is attractive and saying you want to bang her.


262 posted on 10/15/2009 12:03:00 PM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Blankety blankety blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

“I find it ironic that a game of make-believe caused you to cast dispersions on my understanding of it.”

Dangit, meant to say casting Aspersions.


263 posted on 10/15/2009 12:03:19 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
That's why he said sexually attractive
264 posted on 10/15/2009 12:04:46 PM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
she wouldn’t hit you, except with a flyswatter

and that's what makes it pleasant to daydream. Why take that away from somebody?

265 posted on 10/15/2009 12:06:34 PM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: MrB

“Do you then agree that there might be a difference between
‘oh, she is an attractive woman’
and
‘I’d f’ that!’”

There is no fundamental difference. It’s not the way you’d phrase it in certain company, and it’s not something we’re encouraged to admit. But to most men, finding a woman attractive is to find them sexually attractive. And to find them sexually attractive is to want to have sex with them, given the right circumstances.

As I’ve been saying, there are factors that could stand in the way. For some people, their sexual history or ideology, for instance, might be a turn-off. Forgiving as we are, most of us are willing to look past such shortcomings.


266 posted on 10/15/2009 12:08:08 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; xsmommy

What is pathetic is that an heiress is so lacking in a life that she sits alone in a hotel room twittering her boobs for a cheap thrill. Her family needs to stage an intervention.


267 posted on 10/15/2009 12:08:14 PM PDT by tioga (Drip, Drip, Drip.........the ACORNS are falling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa

Again, you are saying it doesn’t matter if she is a mass murderer, a Bill Ayers devotee, an Obama lover.... if you find her pretty you’d have sex with her. So she is just a pretty package with a vagina. Fence jumping dogs G...


268 posted on 10/15/2009 12:09:45 PM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Blankety blankety blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

“No, there is a difference between saying someone is attractive and saying you want to bang her.”

To (some) women, yes. To (most) men, no.


269 posted on 10/15/2009 12:10:24 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

Will you just stop - all you are doing is convincing me more and more that you need therapy. Go fantasize about Meghan....


270 posted on 10/15/2009 12:11:56 PM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Blankety blankety blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

“Will you just stop - all you are doing is convincing me more and more that you need therapy. Go fantasize about Meghan...”

Enough with the ad hominem attacks. If you don’t like what I’m saying, don’t respond.


271 posted on 10/15/2009 12:15:25 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
No - the things you list take away from the physical beauty, and, based on how hot she is to start with/how messed up she may be, it may subtract so much that she's out of the Doable category.

Frankly I've been suspicious for years now that women act weird in front of me just to make sure I have enough to subtract so as I'll leave them alone. Take XS for example - a person can't really be like that, right?

272 posted on 10/15/2009 12:17:06 PM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

“If you don’t like what I’m saying, don’t respond.”

Correction, if you don’t consider what I’m saying worthy of response, don’t respond. The point being, either respond to my arguments or don’t. Please don’t psychoanalyze.


273 posted on 10/15/2009 12:18:11 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa
Well you've thrown yourself in with a guy who did not take any of those things into consideration and claims men are ruled by their penis - pretty woman equals sex. Sorry, but that is what he said.

And xs is going to ream you over that remark.. lol

274 posted on 10/15/2009 12:19:03 PM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Blankety blankety blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
xs....reaming....me

dang it, why does that last 1/3rd of a complete fantasy always bite me in the butt (so to speak).

You be right though, Whyisa(nametoolongtocare) - I should have read more - behavior totally fits into the attractiveness equation.

275 posted on 10/15/2009 12:22:05 PM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

I’d click on Meghan McCain’s thread with a sexually promising title and a knowledge of Freepers habit of posting pictures w/ the wife not around... but that is about all.


276 posted on 10/15/2009 12:35:19 PM PDT by LowOiL (Tagline: Optional, printed after your name on post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Darned human nature! :)


277 posted on 10/15/2009 12:49:09 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

I don’t discuss, in public, if I would be willing to have sex with someone. You DO know what the term “I’d hit that” means don’t you? It’s one thing to say someone is attractive. I think that going further is really more info than most people want (and those who really want to hear about that—are they folks you want to share with??!)


278 posted on 10/15/2009 12:51:27 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

Then hon, if you’re simply trying to say she’s attractive, why don’t you say that? Why do you have to say it in a crude and sexual manner? That’s really what puzzles me.


279 posted on 10/15/2009 12:53:57 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; Hegewisch Dupa

Like females do not go after bad boys and criminals. It is a harmless verbal game, just like with the guilty not guilty for female teaches (that have sex with students.


280 posted on 10/15/2009 12:54:46 PM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 321-338 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson