Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meghan McCain runs into backlash over photograph
CNN ^ | 10/15/09 | staff (no pun intended)

Posted on 10/15/2009 7:15:04 AM PDT by pissant

(CNN) – Meghan McCain says she's ready to quit Twitter all together after generating a wave of criticism from users of the popular social networking site Wednesday night for posting a picture of herself in a tank top that left little to the twitterverse's imagination.

The controversy began quietly enough when McCain, the vocal daughter of the former Republican presidential candidate, tweeted that her self described "spontaneous" night in included reading a biography of the iconic artist Andy Warhol and ordering takeout.

It was there the 24-year old McCain posted the photo of herself wearing a tank top that generated the subsequent controversy .

(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: boobs; booby; idiot; jubtabulous; meghanislarge; meghanmccain; meghanspuppies; nomanwilllayher; rabscuttlesgirl; rinoette; stupidpeople; twit; wastedmammaries
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 321-338 next last
To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

i was trying to figure out how she positioned herself for the photo to get them to do that, all i can figure is she’s got some sort of hardcore push up bra on to get that much cleavage going on, unless she’s standing on her head. if they are real, that is not a natural position for boobs.


181 posted on 10/15/2009 9:53:25 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

Natural positions are over-rated


182 posted on 10/15/2009 9:54:32 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa

My son just said she looks like Bethy on Dog the Bounty Hunter! lol


183 posted on 10/15/2009 9:56:20 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Blankety blankety blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

trying to figure out how she positioned herself? huh? now you are sounding kinky. ;^)


184 posted on 10/15/2009 9:56:20 AM PDT by tioga (Drip, Drip, Drip.........the ACORNS are falling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

that is a GREAT slap down!


185 posted on 10/15/2009 9:57:08 AM PDT by tioga (Drip, Drip, Drip.........the ACORNS are falling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer1

Reminds me of a former freeper who had photos of herself all over her profile page in various stages of undress... her brain power was about equal to this twit too


186 posted on 10/15/2009 9:58:30 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Blankety blankety blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
I’m so very sick of people using “curves” as a euphamism for fat. The curve that really matters is the one formed by the breasts, hips, and waist. Nothing endemic to fat girls make this curve better. In fact, their waists tend to mess it up.

Well a curve on a woman is usual adipose tissue or "fat". Nothing inherently wrong with some body fat, infact it's actually good for your health come to find out. Now this does not mean morbidly obese talking like my wife she is 5'2" 160lbs with a nice round tush, ample busoms and yes a little pooch in the belly. But I can tell you we go out and all the heads turn when she enters the room, she looks damn good for having 2 kids.

187 posted on 10/15/2009 9:59:57 AM PDT by pburgh01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

It is my opinion that those who claim they’d hit anything, aren’t hitting anything and haven’t in awhile....


188 posted on 10/15/2009 10:01:18 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Blankety blankety blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

easy statement once YOU decide the definition of “anything”


189 posted on 10/15/2009 10:02:49 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

My first thought...What a skank


190 posted on 10/15/2009 10:05:36 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

Yeah unless you are pregnant, real ones are rarely that hard and full! lol They are almost up under her chin - I’m just laughing at this because her response to criticism, which she obviously didn’t think she was going to get, was that she was just lounging around - didnt see the big deal - I say no woman will deliberately put a photo of herself on the internet if she doesn’t look at it closely - very closely - Meghan knew this was a photo of her boobs and a book.... she didn’t even notice how bad her face looked from that angle - she was focused on the boobs but lied about it when people said it was trashy looking


191 posted on 10/15/2009 10:06:25 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Blankety blankety blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa

There is a difference between buxom and flabby though.

This gal clearly has her mothers looks, unfortunatley though she carries a bit too much girth to be put in the “buxom” category.

I enjoy a woman with curves, but there is a limit to the excess where it becomes detrimental at least in terms of what I find attractive. This gal is definately far more than 20 lbs overweight. As long as you picture her from the chest up, no issues, or lying down, but if you see her standing full body, she has a bit too much around the middle for my taste.


192 posted on 10/15/2009 10:06:29 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Fair ‘nuf


193 posted on 10/15/2009 10:07:55 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa

A date with “Jill” doesn’t really qualify now does it?


194 posted on 10/15/2009 10:10:32 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Blankety blankety blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

I’d hit her from 600 yards away.


195 posted on 10/15/2009 10:11:38 AM PDT by Lazamataz (DEFINITION: rac-ist (rA'sis't) 1. Anyone who disagrees with a liberal about any topic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

Jill?


196 posted on 10/15/2009 10:13:30 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: pburgh01

“Well a curve on a woman is usual adipose tissue or ‘fat’”

Yes, but we call a woman “fat” because she has stores of fat in the wrong places. For instance, collected around her waist instead of on her hips and breasts.

“Nothing inherently wrong with some body fat, infact it’s actually good for your health come to find out.”

True, but irrelevant. Attractive women tend to have the same ratio between their hips and waist within a certain range, which we shall call “healthy”. If she’s malnourished or obese, that will change. But those are the extreme cases. In general, how many “curves” you have has little to do with how “fat” you are. And if fat women have more curves than skinny ones, it’s the wrong kind of curves.

“But I can tell you we go out and all the heads turn when she enters the room, she looks damn good for having 2 kids”

Good for her. No one ever said people who fail on the Body Mass Index can’t be attractive. Not having seen your wife, I can’t say for certain, but I’ll bet it’s not because she’s curvier than other women. People can appreciate “a nice round tush” and “ample busoms” without a relatively small waist for reflief. But women who do have the parabolic waist to go along with the round tush and ample busoms, will, statistically speaking, beat out your wife. Them’s the breaks.


197 posted on 10/15/2009 10:14:18 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: izzatzo
The McCains seem to have become the GOP Kennedys-will we ever be rid of them? Answer to self: Not so long as we have the current MSM.

Just her, Dad and maybe Mom. The rest of the family stays out of the spotlight. Two of his sons are in the military now.

198 posted on 10/15/2009 10:15:54 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: pburgh01

I should add, also, that this whole Better Esteem Through Curves thing started, in my opinion, because larger women like to hold on to the fact that more weight generally equals bigger breasts and ass. Because it’s all they have, besides the prettiness of their faces. I don’t begrudge them this. On the contrary, I agree, nice breasts, etc., are an absolute good.

But they go further, stealing for themselves all the glory that goes along with having curves. It is an illegitimate ploy. Having larger breasts, etc., does not make you curvier, and never will. That’s not what curviness refers to.


199 posted on 10/15/2009 10:19:14 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa

Look down at your right hand, palm away from you.... the thumb and next finger look like a J, then i, l, l....geeze don’t they teach any childish dirty stuff in those private schools up north?


200 posted on 10/15/2009 10:19:20 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Blankety blankety blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 321-338 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson