You doing what you want in regards to religion works for me (and you)just fine. I’m not the judge of what isn’t or is done in the public schools. The law is the judge and if we follow the law then the state can not affect the establishment of any religious view in the public schools. That’s not me; that’s the law.
You doing what you want in regards to religion works for me (and you)just fine. I’m not the judge of what isn’t or is done in the public schools. The law is the judge and if we follow the law then the state can not affect the establishment of any religious view in the public schools. That’s not me; that’s the law.
Recognizing God isn’t an “establishment of religion”.
A judge that hijacks the judicial system and ignores the Constitution to advance an ideology of secular humanism over the wishes of a majority of society, that incidentally was founded in the first place on Judeo-Christian ideology, isn’t “the law”.
And where’s the “free exercise thereof”???? That part always tends to get left out curiously in these public school ideological arguments. How convenient!
BTW...does this premise of yours get to work when creationists point out “the law”, you know the ultimate authority, THE law, God’s Word, biblical scripture...
you know, when anyone that understands scripture is attacked and called racist or a hater and so forth when it comes to origins/creation...?
or is this just another case of liberals making up rules they don’t intend to keep themselves?
Christians understand we answer to a higher authority than a liberal judge. And we don’t buy that a liberal judge, is “the law”.
So no...that’s not “the law”,
that’s epic fail.
We don’t buy it.
Public schools don’t belong to liberals. Not anymore than science does.