I think you probably answered right there.
Curious that you’re so sensitive about it.
Other FReeper attorneys freely disclose it
when they comment, and it lends credibility,
valuable insight and legal reference facts
for the rest of us non-legal types to learn
and digest.
Again, the secrecy is curious and noted.
You are projecting.
"Again, the secrecy is curious and noted."
There's no secrecy involved. It's just you trying to make me the issue instead of the issues themselves. I told you if you had a legitimate reason for asking me a personal question I might answer. But you didn't even bother to offer one. That is what's telling.
Don’t forget the DOJ is paying folks to spread disinformation on the Internet regarding pending cases. Some of the folks posting pro-usurper comments to FR could actually be paid by DOJ disinfo operations.