Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: STARWISE
"I think you probably answered right there. Curious that you’re so sensitive about it."

You are projecting.

"Again, the secrecy is curious and noted."

There's no secrecy involved. It's just you trying to make me the issue instead of the issues themselves. I told you if you had a legitimate reason for asking me a personal question I might answer. But you didn't even bother to offer one. That is what's telling.

286 posted on 10/13/2009 10:50:42 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies ]


To: mlo

That is what’s telling.

``````

Hardly.

What’s telling is that answering that question
would certainly lend more confidence or not in
the multitudes of lawyerly comments you make every
day, day and night, on multitudes of threads
dealing with this issue.

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:mlo/index?brevity=full;tab=comments

And yet you refuse to answer that last tidbit
that, if in the positive, would imbue your
comments with some level of respective expertise
and confidence that would achieve that.

Again, curious.


302 posted on 10/13/2009 11:06:56 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies ]

To: mlo

There’s no secrecy involved.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Secrecy:

Antonyms:

forthrightness, honesty, openness, publicity, revelation


621 posted on 10/13/2009 2:33:25 PM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson