Skip to comments.
Schwarzenegger signs gay rights bills
The Sacramento Bee ^
| Oct. 12, 2009
| Dan Smith
Posted on 10/12/2009 12:30:23 PM PDT by Mojave
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has signed two gay rights bills, one honoring late activist Harvey Milk and another recognizing same-sex marriages performed in other states.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: arnoldlegacy; caglbt; callegislation; homosexualagenda; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Surprise, surprise, surprise!
1
posted on
10/12/2009 12:30:23 PM PDT
by
Mojave
To: Mojave
The Girlie-Man outs himself!
2
posted on
10/12/2009 12:32:01 PM PDT
by
Bernard Marx
("Civilizations die by suicide, not from murder" Toynbee)
To: Bernard Marx
How can he sign a bill recognizing Same Sex Marriage when the state’s Constitution doesn’t?
3
posted on
10/12/2009 12:33:21 PM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: Mojave
Ah-nold gets some fudge on his bird. Film at 11.
4
posted on
10/12/2009 12:33:28 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: Mojave
Isn’t recognition of same-sex “marriages” AGAINST the California state constitution?
5
posted on
10/12/2009 12:35:42 PM PDT
by
massmike
(...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
To: massgopguy
Utah has a similar law and they do not preform Gay Marriage in their state.
The law says that California will not preform Gay Marriages in their state and that Marriage is between one man and one women.
That however does not stop the State from agreeing to recognize marriages preformed in any state, including Gay Marriages.
6
posted on
10/12/2009 12:35:46 PM PDT
by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
To: Mojave
Arnold is living proof that we as a nation are NOT careful enough about who we let immigrate to this country.
7
posted on
10/12/2009 12:36:00 PM PDT
by
AuntB
(If the TALIBAN grew drugs & burned our land instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
To: spikeytx86
time for another constitutional amendment I guess.
8
posted on
10/12/2009 12:37:44 PM PDT
by
TexasFreeper2009
(Obama lied, the economy died)
To: fieldmarshaldj
Tookie.
9
posted on
10/12/2009 12:37:49 PM PDT
by
Mojave
(Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
To: AuntB
I hear what you’re saying, but the status really hasn’t much to do with it. All you have to do is be tempted with some power and authority and no matter how long you’ve been a citizen through how many generations, you might find yourself doing just what Arnold is doing. It’s a urban moral decay thing more than an immigration issue, IMHO.
10
posted on
10/12/2009 12:38:02 PM PDT
by
BelegStrongbow
(I'm still waiting for Dear Leader to say something that isn't a lie)
To: spikeytx86
So homosexual marriage is basically legal in Utah? All one has to do is go to Massachusetts and get married.
To: Mojave
Tookie sho ‘nuff had a wicked ‘fro, yo.
12
posted on
10/12/2009 12:39:54 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: Mojave
God will not honor or bless a nation that recognizes perversion as good and the murder of the unborn and partial born. God will not be mocked.
13
posted on
10/12/2009 12:40:37 PM PDT
by
brushcop
(SFC Sallie, CPL Long, LTHarris, SSG Brown, PVT Simmons KIA OIF lll&V, they died for you, honor them)
To: Mojave
??? Did Arnuld want to save tookie?
Ken & John on KFI were hilarious with tookie and the most recent smack down vote in CA against raising taxes.
14
posted on
10/12/2009 12:43:13 PM PDT
by
Frantzie
(Do we want ACORN running America's health care?)
To: massmike
The entire text of Proposition 8 is as follows:
“Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid and recognized in California.”
15
posted on
10/12/2009 12:43:14 PM PDT
by
edge10
(Obama lied, babies died!)
To: Frantzie
Did Arnuld want to save tookie?Just savor.
16
posted on
10/12/2009 12:45:45 PM PDT
by
Mojave
(Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
To: Mojave
Is Schwarzenegger intentionally creating a law that will be challenged in the CA Supreme Court, as a back-door way to get Prop 8 revisited?
Any challenge to this will have to include interpretation of Prop 8, right? Will this give the CA Supreme Court a chance to narrowly interpret Prop 8 into non-existence?
-PJ
17
posted on
10/12/2009 12:46:51 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(Comprehensive congressional reform legislation only yields incomprehensible bills that nobody reads.)
To: edge10
“Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid and recognized in California.” Can Arnold read?
18
posted on
10/12/2009 12:47:18 PM PDT
by
Mojave
(Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
To: massgopguy
So true. He does not have that authority. As far as milk, the man was despised until shot. Amazing how a bullet changes peoples view of a person.
19
posted on
10/12/2009 12:47:56 PM PDT
by
svcw
(Legalism reinforces self-righteousness - it communicates to you the good news of your own goodness)
To: edge10
Kind of hard to NOT understand that.But Ahhnold found a way.
20
posted on
10/12/2009 12:51:52 PM PDT
by
massmike
(...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson